CVE-2021-1593
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco Packet Tracer for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL injection attack on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials on the Windows system. This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of directory paths at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting a configuration file in a specific path on the system, which can cause a malicious DLL file to be loaded when the application starts. A successful exploit could allow an attacker with normal user privileges to execute arbitrary code on the affected system with the privileges of another user’s account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a DLL injection vulnerability in Cisco Packet Tracer for Windows where an authenticated local attacker with valid Windows credentials can place a malicious configuration file in a specific directory path. When Packet Tracer starts, it incorrectly handles the directory path and loads a malicious DLL from this location, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of another user account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.2.0= 7.2.1= 7.2.2= 7.3.0= 7.3.1= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco Packet Tracer is installedOpen Windows Programs and Features or check common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Cisco Packet Tracer or C:\Program Files (x86)\Cisco Packet Tracer for the presence of Cisco Packet TracerAffected if The software is not installed on the Windows system
-
Identify installed Packet Tracer versionRight-click the Packet Tracer executable (usually PacketTracer.exe), select Properties, and view the File version on the Details tab. Alternatively, open the application and check Help > About Cisco Packet TracerAffected if The installed version is 7.2.0, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.3.0, 7.3.1, or 8.0
-
Review DLL search path directories for write permissionsUse icacls or Right-click > Properties > Security on directories where Packet Tracer is installed and its configuration files are stored. Check which users or groups have Write or Create permissionsAffected if Untrusted or low-privilege users have Write access to any directory in Packet Tracer's DLL search or configuration load path
-
Check for malicious configuration filesInspect the Packet Tracer application directory and any subdirectories for unexpected .dll or .ini configuration files that were not created by the installation or legitimate usersAffected if Unexpected DLL or config files exist in directories that Packet Tracer reads from on startup
-
Verify user account isolationReview which Windows user accounts have physical or console access to the system, and check if multiple users share accounts or have concurrent login capabilitiesAffected if Multiple users have authenticated access to the same Windows system running Packet Tracer
You are affected if Cisco Packet Tracer versions 7.2.0 through 8.0 are installed and untrusted users have write access to directories in the application's DLL search path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch from Cisco when available. In the interim, ensure untrusted users do not have write access to directories in the application's DLL search path, and restrict who has physical or logical access to the Windows system running Packet Tracer.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1593 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1593 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data