CVE-2021-20589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer access with incorrect length value vulnerability in GOT2000 series GT27 model communication driver versions 01.19.000 through 01.38.000, GT25 model communication driver versions 01.19.000 through 01.38.000, GT23 model communication driver versions 01.19.000 through 01.38.000 and GT21 model communication driver versions 01.21.000 through 01.39.000, GOT SIMPLE series GS21 model communication driver versions 01.21.000 through 01.39.000, GT SoftGOT2000 versions 1.170C through 1.250L and Tension Controller LE7-40GU-L Screen package data for MODBUS/TCP V1.00 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to stop the communication function of the products via specially crafted packets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer access with incorrect length value vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric GOT2000 series and related HMI communication drivers for MODBUS/TCP allows remote unauthenticated attackers to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted packets that trigger the incorrect length calculation, stopping the communication function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 01.19.000, <= 01.38.000>= 01.19.000, <= 01.38.000>= 01.19.000, <= 01.38.000>= 01.21.000, <= 01.39.000>= 01.21.000, <= 01.39.000>= 1.170c, <= 1.250lCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the GOT2000 series modelLocate the HMI model designation on the physical device or in the system documentation. Common models include GT27, GT25, GT23, GT21, GS21, or GT SoftGOT2000.Affected if The model is any of the following: GT27, GT25, GT23, GT21, GS21, or GT SoftGOT2000.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the HMI device via Ethernet or USB and navigate to the system settings, or consult the project file exported from GT Designer3. The firmware version is typically displayed in the system information or device properties screen.Affected if The firmware version falls within these ranges: GT27/GT25/GT23: 01.19.000 to 01.38.000; GT21/GS21: 01.21.000 to 01.39.000; GT SoftGOT2000: 1.170c to 1.250l.
-
Confirm MODBUS/TCP communication driver is in useReview the GT Designer3 project settings and confirm whether a MODBUS/TCP connection is configured in the communication settings or driver list. Check if MODBUS/TCP is listed as an active communication driver.Affected if MODBUS/TCP communication driver is enabled and configured for communication with external devices.
-
Review system logs for communication failuresExamine the HMI logs or event records for recent denial of service events or communication interruptions. Look for unexplained communication stoppages that coincide with external MODBUS/TCP traffic.Affected if There are unexplained communication stoppages or denial of service events related to MODBUS/TCP.
A system is affected if it uses any of the listed GOT2000 models (GT27/GT25/GT23/GT21/GS21/GT SoftGOT2000) with firmware within the vulnerable version ranges AND has MODBUS/TCP communication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate affected communication drivers to versions beyond the vulnerable range (GT27/GT25/GT23: 01.39.000 or later; GT21/GS21: 01.40.000 or later; GT SoftGOT2000: 1.250M or later) and apply any available Tension Controller screen package updates. Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict MODBUS/TCP access to trusted sources as compensating controls if immediate patching is not feasible.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data