FortisandboxApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2021-22125

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-07-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2.2 or later.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An instance of improper neutralization of special elements in the sniffer module of FortiSandbox before 3.2.2 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute commands on the underlying system's shell via altering the content of its configuration file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FortiSandbox versions prior to 3.2.2 contain a command injection vulnerability in the sniffer module. An authenticated administrator can inject arbitrary shell commands by modifying the content of the sniffer module's configuration file, allowing complete compromise of the underlying system.

MitigationUpgrade FortiSandbox to version 3.2.2 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, restrict administrator access to only trusted personnel and monitor configuration file changes for suspicious activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortisandboxApplication
Affected:< 3.2.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FortiSandbox installation and version
    Access the FortiSandbox CLI or web interface and retrieve the firmware version. In CLI, run: get system status or execute: fnbcmd -v to display the installed version.
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 3.2.2 (e.g., 3.2.1, 3.2.0, 3.1.x, earlier).
  2. Confirm the sniffer module is configured
    Navigate to the FortiSandbox web interface: Network > Sniffer or use CLI: diagnose-sniffer. Alternatively, inspect the configuration file /etc/fsa/sandbox.conf or the sniffer configuration under /app/ directory.
    Affected if The sniffer module is enabled and has an active configuration profile (the vulnerability requires this module to be present and configurable).
  3. Check for unauthorized configuration changes
    Review the sniffer module configuration file for unexpected content, particularly in fields that should accept only network interface names or IDs. Use: cat /etc/fsa/sniffer.conf or check the configuration via GUI history if available.
    Affected if The configuration file contains shell metacharacters, suspicious command strings, or unexpected paths that were not intentionally added by administrators.
  4. Audit administrator access logs
    Review FortiSandbox logs for administrative actions related to sniffer configuration changes. Use the web interface: Log & Report > Event Log > Configuration, or CLI: execute log filter category 2, then execute log display.
    Affected if There are configuration modification events from administrator accounts that are unexpected or from unauthorized sources.

A user is affected if FortiSandbox version is below 3.2.2 AND the sniffer module is configured/enabled, allowing an authenticated administrator to inject commands via the sniffer configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2.2 or later
Fixed in 3.2.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiSandbox to version 3.2.2 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, restrict administrator access to only trusted personnel and monitor configuration file changes for suspicious activity.

Fix this in Fortisandbox Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22125 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22125 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data