CVE-2021-22555
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap out-of-bounds write affecting Linux since v2.6.19-rc1 was discovered in net/netfilter/x_tables.c. This allows an attacker to gain privileges or cause a DoS (via heap memory corruption) through user name space
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Linux kernel's netfilter x_tables module (net/netfilter/x_tables.c) present since v2.6.19-rc1 (approximately 2006). Exploitable through user namespaces to achieve local privilege escalation or cause denial of service via heap memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.19, < 4.4.267>= 4.5, < 4.9.267>= 4.10, < 4.14.231>= 4.15, < 4.19.188>= 4.20, < 5.4.113>= 5.5, < 5.10.31>= 5.11, < 5.12all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your Linux kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to retrieve the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within any of these ranges: >= 2.6.19 and < 4.4.267; >= 4.5 and < 4.9.267; >= 4.10 and < 4.14.231; >= 4.15 and < 4.19.188; >= 4.20 and < 5.4.113; >= 5.5 and < 5.10.31; >= 5.11 and < 5.12
-
Determine if NetApp C400 firmware is in useCheck the system or NetApp documentation for the C400 appliance firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is any version (all versions are affected)
-
Determine if NetApp C250 firmware is in useCheck the system or NetApp documentation for the C250 appliance firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is any version (all versions are affected)
-
Determine if NetApp H-series firmware is in useCheck the system or NetApp documentation for H410c, H300s, H500s, H700s, or H410s appliance firmware versionsAffected if Any of these H-series firmware versions are in use (all versions are affected)
-
Verify if user namespaces are accessibleTest by running 'unshare --user whoami' as a non-root user; check /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_userns_clone (if present)Affected if User namespaces can be created by unprivileged users, which is required for the exploit to be triggered
You are affected if your Linux kernel version is within any of the listed vulnerable ranges, or if you are running any version of the listed NetApp firmware, AND user namespaces are accessible to local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.2674.9.2674.14.231
Apply kernel security patches; consider disabling user namespaces if not required to reduce attack surface.
Upgrade to Linux kernel >= 4.4.267, >= 4.9.267, >= 4.14.231, >= 4.19.188, or a modern stable release (5.x/6.x) that includes the x_tables.c fix
- 1. Identify the currently running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- 2. Check if the system is using a supported kernel version within the affected ranges (< 4.4.267, < 4.9.267, < 4.14.231, or < 4.19.188)
- 3. For enterprise Linux distributions (RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian), check for and install available kernel updates via the package manager (e.g., 'yum update' or 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade')
- 4. For custom or upstream kernels, compile and install a kernel version >= 4.4.267 (for 4.4.x branch), >= 4.9.267 (for 4.9.x branch), >= 4.14.231 (for 4.14.x branch), or >= 4.19.188 (for 4.19.x branch)
- 5. For newer kernel branches (5.x and 6.x), ensure the version includes the x_tables.c fix (commit available in git.kernel.org)
- 6. Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- 7. Verify the fix is applied by checking 'uname -r' shows a patched version and confirming the kernel config includes x_tables/iptable_filter support
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22555 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22555 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data