CVE-2021-22600
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA double free bug in packet_set_ring() in net/packet/af_packet.c can be exploited by a local user through crafted syscalls to escalate privileges or deny service. We recommend upgrading kernel past the effected versions or rebuilding past ec6af094ea28f0f2dda1a6a33b14cd57e36a9755
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA double free vulnerability in the packet_set_ring() function in net/packet/af_packet.c allows local users to trigger the bug through crafted syscalls, potentially leading to privilege escalation or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.14.175, < 4.14.259>= 4.19.114, < 4.19.222>= 5.4.29, < 5.4.168>= 5.5.14, < 5.10.88>= 5.11, < 5.15.11= 9.0= 10.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the running Linux kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the kernel version, then compare it against the affected ranges: 4.14.175-4.14.258, 4.19.114-4.19.221, 5.4.29-5.4.167, 5.5.14-5.10.87, 5.11-5.15.10Affected if The kernel version falls within any of the affected ranges listed
-
Confirm the system is Debian 9 or 10Run 'cat /etc/debian_version' to identify the Debian releaseAffected if The system is running Debian 9.0 or 10.0, which ship kernels within the affected version ranges
-
Check for NetApp firmware version on affected modelsFor NetApp 8300, 8700, A400, C400, H410c, H300s systems, use the vendor-provided interface or CLI command to retrieve the firmware versionAffected if The NetApp device is any firmware version of the listed models (all versions are affected)
-
Verify packet socket functionality is availableCheck if AF_PACKET support is present by examining kernel config 'CONFIG_PACKET' or testing with 'grep -q packet /proc/modules && echo loaded' or attempting to create a packet socket with a test programAffected if The system has packet socket support (CONFIG_PACKET) enabled, which is required to trigger the vulnerable code path in packet_set_ring()
A system is affected if it runs a Linux kernel version within the listed ranges, or is a Debian 9/10 system, or is an affected NetApp model at any firmware version, and has packet socket functionality available.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.14.2594.19.2225.4.168
Upgrade the Linux kernel to a version beyond the affected releases, or rebuild/patch the kernel with the fix from commit ec6af094ea28f0f2dda1a6a33b14cd57e36a9755.
Linux Kernel >= 4.14.259, >= 4.19.222, >= 5.4.168, or >= 5.10.88 depending on your branch; Debian 10 users should apply security updates or migrate to Debian 11
- Identify the currently running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Check your distribution's available kernel packages (e.g., 'apt list --installed | grep linux-image' on Debian/Ubuntu, 'rpm -qa kernel' on RHEL/CentOS)
- Upgrade to a fixed kernel version: for 4.14.x series use >= 4.14.259, for 4.19.x use >= 4.19.222, for 5.4.x use >= 5.4.168, for 5.10.x use >= 5.10.88
- On Debian systems, apply Debian LTS updates or upgrade to Debian 11 (Bullseye) which includes fixed kernel 5.10
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel ('sudo reboot')
- Verify the fix by checking 'uname -r' shows a version >= the fixed version for your branch
- Confirm the vulnerability is patched by checking the kernel version against the af_packet.c fix commit ec6af094ea28f0f2dda1a6a33b14cd57e36a9755
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22600 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22600 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data