CVE-2021-22951
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthorized individuals could view password protected files using view_inline in Concrete CMS (previously concrete 5) prior to version 8.5.7. Concrete CMS now checks to see if a file has a password in view_inline and, if it does, the file is not rendered.For version 8.5.6, the following mitigations were put in place a. restricting file types for view_inline to images only b. putting a warning in the file manager to advise users.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team"Concrete CMS security team CVSS scoring is 5.3: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NThis fix is also in Concrete version 9.0.0
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConcrete CMS versions before 8.5.7 had an information disclosure vulnerability where the view_inline function allowed unauthorized access to password-protected files. The view_inline endpoint did not check whether a file had password protection enabled before rendering it, allowing anyone with the direct file URL to bypass the password requirement and view the file contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.5.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Concrete CMS installed versionCheck the dashboard under Dashboard > System & Settings > Basics > Site Name or inspect the application/config/version.php file if it exists. Compare the version number to the vulnerable range (before 8.5.7).Affected if Installed version is 8.5.6 or lower, or any version below 8.5.7 (including 9.x versions below 9.0.0).
-
Determine if view_inline endpoint is accessibleCheck if the /index.php/download_file/view_inline/ or /ccm/api/v1/files/view_inline endpoint responds without authentication. This is the vulnerable endpoint that should not render password-protected files.Affected if The endpoint returns file contents without prompting for a password or requiring authentication.
-
Check for password-protected filesIn the File Manager (Dashboard > Files > Files), review files that have password protection enabled (indicated by a lock icon or password protection setting). Note the direct file URLs for these protected files.Affected if Password-protected files exist in the system and can be accessed via direct URL without password prompt.
-
Verify password protection bypassAttempt to access a known password-protected file using its direct URL (e.g., /index.php/download_file/view_inline/FILE_ID). Observe whether the file content renders without requiring password entry.Affected if The file renders completely without any password prompt, confirming the bypass vulnerability exists.
You are affected if your Concrete CMS version is before 8.5.7 (or before 9.0.0 for the 9.x branch) and password-protected files can be accessed via the view_inline endpoint without entering a password.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.7
Upgrade Concrete CMS to version 8.5.7 or 9.0.0 which implements password verification in the view_inline function. As an interim measure for version 8.5.6, restrict view_inline to image file types only and warn users about the vulnerability in the file manager.
Concrete CMS 8.5.7 or 9.0.0
- Backup the current Concrete CMS database and files before proceeding with any upgrade
- Download Concrete CMS version 8.5.7 or 9.0.0 from the official Concrete CMS repository or download page
- Review the official upgrade guide for the target version at documentation.concretecms.org
- Upload the new files to the server, replacing the existing installation
- Run the database upgrade process through the Concrete CMS dashboard or command line
- Verify that password-protected files are no longer accessible via view_inline without authentication
- Test that image files render correctly through view_inline after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22951 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22951 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data