CVE-2021-23028
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.2, and 13.1.x before 13.1.4, when JSON content profiles are configured for URLs as part of an F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall (WAF)/BIG-IP ASM security policy and applied to a virtual server, undisclosed requests may cause the BIG-IP ASM bd process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn F5 BIG-IP ASM (Application Security Manager) / Advanced WAF, when JSON content profiles are configured for URLs as part of a WAF security policy and applied to a virtual server, certain undisclosed requests can trigger a crash in the ASM bd (background daemon) process, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.3.5, <= 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.3.1, <= 14.1.4.1>= 15.1.1, < 15.1.3.1= 16.0.1>= 13.1..3.5, <= 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.3.1, <= 14.1.4.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3.1= 16.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify ASM or Advanced WAF module is provisionedRun 'tmsh list sys provision module' and check if asm or advanced-waf is provisionedAffected if Module is not provisioned means the vulnerability does not apply
-
Check BIG-IP version against affected rangesRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the version displayed in the management consoleAffected if Version falls within: 13.1.3.5-13.1.3.6, 14.1.3.1-14.1.4.1, 15.1.0-15.1.3.0, or exactly 16.0.1
-
Identify WAF security policies with JSON content profilesUse BIG-IP configuration: 'tmsh list asm policy' then examine each policy for content profiles of type JSON using 'tmsh list asm policy <policy_name> profiles'Affected if JSON content profiles are configured on any URL within a security policy
-
Verify if vulnerable policy is applied to a virtual serverRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual' and check the 'security-namespace' or 'policy' field to see if the ASM policy with JSON content profiles is referencedAffected if A policy containing JSON content profiles is applied to a virtual server
-
Monitor ASM bd process for crashesCheck system logs in /var/log/asm for 'bd' process crashes or run 'tmsh show asm status' to observe bd process healthAffected if ASM bd process has crashed or exhibits instability
User is affected if ASM/Advanced WAF is provisioned, version is within the affected ranges, and a WAF policy with JSON content profiles applied to a virtual server exists in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.3.1
Upgrade F5 BIG-IP to fixed versions: 16.0.1.2 or later, 15.1.3.1 or later, 14.1.4.2 or later, or 13.1.4 or later.
Upgrade to 13.1.4+ (13.1.x), 14.1.4.2+ (14.1.x), 15.1.3.1+ (15.1.x), or 16.0.1.2+ (16.0.x)
- 1. Identify the current Big-IP version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the web management console.
- 2. Determine which release branch you are currently on (13.1.x, 14.1.x, 15.1.x, or 16.0.x).
- 3. For 13.1.x: Upgrade to version 13.1.4 or later (13.1.4+).
- 4. For 14.1.x: Upgrade to version 14.1.4.2 or later (14.1.4.2+).
- 5. For 15.1.x: Upgrade to version 15.1.3.1 or later (15.1.3.1+).
- 6. For 16.0.x: Upgrade to version 16.0.1.2 or later (16.0.1.2+).
- 7. Download the appropriate Hotfix from F5 Networks support portal (support.f5.com) after logging in with valid credentials.
- 8. Upload the hotfix to the Big-IP device via GUI (System > Software Management > Hotfix > Upload) or via tmsh: 'install sys software hotfix <filename> volume volume1'.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23028 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23028 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data