CVE-2021-23281
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.69 is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. IPM software does not sanitize the date provided via coverterCheckList action in meta_driver_srv.js class. Attackers can send a specially crafted packet to make IPM connect to rouge SNMP server and execute attacker-controlled code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) before version 1.69 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the meta_driver_srv.js class. The coverterCheckList action fails to sanitize input, allowing attackers to send specially crafted packets that cause IPM to connect to a rogue SNMP server and execute attacker-controlled code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.69CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Eaton IPM is installedCheck common installation paths: Windows: C:\Program Files\Eaton\Intelligent Power Manager or C:\Program Files (x86)\Eaton\Intelligent Power Manager. Linux: /opt/Eaton/ipm or /usr/local/ipm. Also check running services for 'Eaton IPM' or 'ipm' processes.Affected if Eaton Intelligent Power Manager is installed and running on the system
-
Determine installed IPM versionCheck version file in installation directory: Windows: look for version.txt or check Add/Remove Programs. Linux: check /opt/Eaton/ipm/version.txt or run 'rpm -q ipm'/'dpkg -l | grep ipm'. The web interface may also show version in About/Help pages.Affected if Installed version is lower than 1.69 (e.g., 1.68, 1.67, etc.)
-
Verify web interface exposureCheck if IPM web service is accessible on network. Default ports are 4679, 4680, 4681 (HTTPS). Scan local ports or check firewall rules: 'netstat -an | grep -E "(4679|4680|4681)"' or review firewall configuration.Affected if IPM web interface is accessible from network (unauthenticated vulnerability)
-
Inspect for suspicious SNMP configurationsReview IPM configuration files for unexpected SNMP server entries. Check files in config directory: snmp-config.xml, device-config.xml, or similar. Look for external IP addresses in SNMP settings that were not configured by your organization.Affected if SNMP configuration contains unfamiliar or external SNMP server addresses
A system is affected if Eaton IPM version is below 1.69 and the web management interface is network-accessible, allowing unauthenticated attackers to trigger the vulnerable converterCheckList action.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.69
Upgrade Eaton IPM to version 1.69 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict network access to the IPM management interface and monitor for suspicious SNMP connections.
Eaton Intelligent Power Manager version 1.69 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of Eaton Intelligent Power Manager installed on the system
- 2. Download Eaton Intelligent Power Manager version 1.69 or later from the official Eaton website (www.eaton.com)
- 3. Create a backup of the current IPM configuration and data
- 4. Stop the Intelligent Power Manager service before applying the upgrade
- 5. Install version 1.69 or later of IPM using the downloaded installer
- 6. Restart the Intelligent Power Manager service after installation completes
- 7. Verify the installation was successful by checking the version number in the application
- 8. Test that normal IPM functionality is working as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,288.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23281 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23281 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data