RancherApplication

CVE-2021-25318

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-07-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.4.16 / 2.5.9 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Rancher allows users in the cluster to modify resources they should not have access to. This issue affects: Rancher versions prior to 2.5.9 ; Rancher versions prior to 2.4.16.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Rancher versions prior to 2.5.9 and 2.4.16 contain an incorrect permission assignment vulnerability where cluster users can modify resources they should not have access to. This is an authorization bypass allowing privilege escalation within the cluster.

MitigationUpgrade Rancher to version 2.5.9 or 2.4.16 or later to remediate the improper permission assignment for critical resources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RancherApplication
Affected:< 2.4.16>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine Rancher server version
    Access the Rancher UI and navigate to the support page, or query the Rancher API endpoint /v1 management.cattle.io.setting/fleet-private-registry. Alternatively, check the Helm chart or Docker container version if deployed via those methods.
    Affected if The installed version is less than 2.4.16, or greater than or equal to 2.5.0 but less than 2.5.9
  2. Identify cluster users with elevated access
    Review the cluster's RBAC role bindings and user assignments through the Rancher UI under Clusters > Security > Members, or via kubectl get clusterrolebindings if kubectl is configured.
    Affected if Non-admin users are assigned elevated roles within the cluster who should have restricted access to critical resources
  3. Verify authorization configuration for cluster-scoped resources
    Test whether cluster users without full administrator privileges can modify resources outside their intended scope by attempting to create, modify, or delete resources in namespaces or projects they should not have access to.
    Affected if Users can perform operations on resources that their assigned role should explicitly deny

You are affected if your Rancher version is below 2.4.16 or between 2.5.0 and 2.5.8 inclusive, and you have cluster users who could potentially exploit the authorization bypass to access resources beyond their permitted scope.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.4.16 / 2.5.9 or later
Fixed in 2.4.162.5.9
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Rancher to version 2.5.9 or 2.4.16 or later to remediate the improper permission assignment for critical resources.

Recommended fix High confidence

Rancher 2.4.16 or Rancher 2.5.9 (depending on your major version branch)

  1. Backup your Rancher environment and Kubernetes clusters before upgrading
  2. Upgrade Rancher to version 2.4.16 if currently on the 2.4.x line
  3. Upgrade Rancher to version 2.5.9 if currently on the 2.5.x line
  4. After upgrading, verify that the permission assignments are correctly enforced
  5. Review user roles and permissions to ensure they align with expected access controls
  6. Test that users can only modify resources they are authorized to access
Caveat Review Rancher release notes for breaking changes between your current version and the target version; backup is strongly recommended before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Rancher Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-25318 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-25318 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data