CVE-2021-25745
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where a user that can create or update ingress objects can use the spec.rules[].http.paths[].path field of an Ingress object (in the networking.k8s.io or extensions API group) to obtain the credentials of the ingress-nginx controller. In the default configuration, that credential has access to all secrets in the cluster.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in ingress-nginx allows users with permissions to create or update Ingress objects to manipulate the spec.rules[].http.paths[].path field to extract credentials from the ingress-nginx controller. In the default configuration, these credentials have cluster-wide access to all secrets, enabling lateral movement and complete cluster compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ingress-nginx versionRun 'kubectl get pods -n ingress-nginx -o jsonpath="{.items[*].spec.containers[*].image}"' or check the deployment version with 'kubectl describe deployment ingress-nginx-controller -n ingress-nginx'Affected if The installed version is below 1.2.0
-
Verify ingress-nginx namespace existsRun 'kubectl get namespace ingress-nginx' to confirm ingress-nginx is installedAffected if The namespace does not exist (ingress-nginx may not be in use)
-
Check who can create or update Ingress objectsRun 'kubectl auth can-i create ingresses --as=<user>' for relevant users, or inspect ClusterRole/Role bindings with 'kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o wide | grep -i ingress'Affected if Users or service accounts outside of cluster admins have create/update permissions on Ingress objects
-
Review ingress-nginx controller service account permissionsRun 'kubectl auth can-i get secrets --as=system:serviceaccount:ingress-nginx:ingress-nginx' and check ClusterRole bindings: 'kubectl get clusterrolebinding -o wide | grep ingress-nginx'Affected if The ingress-nginx service account has cluster-wide access to secrets (verbs include get/list/watch on all secrets across namespaces)
You are affected if ingress-nginx version is below 1.2.0 AND non-admin users can create/update Ingress objects AND the ingress-nginx controller service account has broad secret access permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.0
Limit permissions on who can create/update Ingress objects and scope the ingress-nginx controller's service account permissions to only required namespaces until the upstream fix is applied.
ingress-nginx controller version 1.2.0 or later
- Check the current version of ingress-nginx controller running in the cluster using: kubectl get pods -n ingress-nginx -o jsonpath='{.items[0].spec.containers[0].image}'
- Upgrade ingress-nginx controller to version 1.2.0 or later. For Helm-based installations, run: helm upgrade ingress-nginx ingress-nginx --ingress-class=nginx --repo=https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx --set controller.image.tag=v1.2.0
- Alternatively, for manifest-based installations, update the deployment YAML and apply: kubectl apply -f <updated-manifest>.yaml
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the controller pod is running and the version is correct: kubectl get pods -n ingress-nginx -l app.kubernetes.io/name=ingress-nginx
- Ensure the ingress-nginx controller has access only to necessary secrets by reviewing RBAC settings and controller configuration
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-25745 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-25745 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data