CVE-2026-3288
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where the `nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target` Ingress annotation can be used to inject configuration into nginx. This can lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the ingress-nginx controller, and disclosure of Secrets accessible to the controller. (Note that in the default installation, the controller can access all Secrets cluster-wide.)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target annotation in the ingress-nginx controller allows configuration injection into the nginx process, enabling arbitrary code execution within the controller's context and disclosure of cluster secrets (which in default installations are accessible cluster-wide).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.13.8>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine ingress-nginx controller versionRun 'kubectl get deployment -n ingress-nginx ingress-nginx-controller -o jsonpath="{.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image}"' or check the ingress-nginx namespace for the controller pod and its image tagAffected if The version is less than 1.13.8, or greater than or equal to 1.14.0 but less than 1.14.4
-
Identify Ingress resources using the rewrite-target annotationRun 'kubectl get ingress -A -o jsonpath="{range .items[?(@.metadata.annotations.nginx\.ingress\.kubernetes\.io/rewrite-target)]}{.metadata.namespace}/{.metadata.name}{end}"' to list namespaces and Ingress names with this annotationAffected if Any Ingress resource has the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target annotation defined
-
Review who can create or modify Ingress resourcesRun 'kubectl auth can-i create ingresses --as=<user>' for untrusted users, or inspect ClusterRoleBindings/RoleBindings that grant ingress create/update permissions to determine if untrusted principals have these rightsAffected if Users or service accounts without full trust can create or modify Ingress objects in any namespace
-
Check for admission controllers validating rewrite-targetInspect any deployed ValidatingWebhookConfiguration or OPA/Gatekeeper policies for rules that validate the rewrite-target annotation value before Ingress creationAffected if No admission control policy exists to validate or restrict the rewrite-target annotation value
You are affected if the ingress-nginx controller version falls in the vulnerable range (< 1.13.8 or >= 1.14.0 to < 1.14.4) AND untrusted users can create or modify Ingress resources that use the rewrite-target annotation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.13.81.14.4
Upgrade ingress-nginx to the patched version and audit/remediate Ingress resources using the rewrite-target annotation to prevent configuration injection.
Upgrade to ingress-nginx controller version 1.14.4 or later (e.g., 1.14.4, 1.15.0, or latest stable release)
- Check current ingress-nginx controller version using: kubectl get pods -n <ingress-namespace> -o jsonpath='{.items[0].spec.containers[0].image}'
- If version is < 1.13.8 or >= 1.14.0 and < 1.14.4, plan for upgrade
- Upgrade ingress-nginx controller to version 1.14.4 or later (e.g., 1.14.4, 1.15.0, or latest stable)
- Apply upgrade via Helm: helm upgrade <release-name> ingress-nginx/ingress-nginx --namespace ingress-nginx --version <new-version>
- Or upgrade via kubectl with new manifest: kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/controller-v<new-version>/deploy/static/provider/cloud/deploy.yaml
- Verify the new pods are running and the controller restarted successfully
- Review ingress resources using the rewrite-target annotation to ensure legitimate usage patterns
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3288 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3288 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data