CVE-2021-26994
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.7P13 and 9.8P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow single workloads to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) on a cluster node.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceClustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.7P13 and 9.8P3 contain a vulnerability where a single workload can cause Denial of Service on a cluster node, likely due to improper resource handling or isolation allowing a workload to exhaust node resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.7= 9.7= 9.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Clustered Data ONTAP is installedRun 'cluster show' or 'version' in the ONTAP CLI to identify the product name and confirm it is NetApp Clustered Data ONTAPAffected if The product is not Clustered Data ONTAP (this CVE only affects that specific product)
-
Identify the installed ONTAP versionRun 'version' in the ONTAP CLI to display the current ONTAP version number (for example, 9.7, 9.8, or later)Affected if Unable to retrieve version information from the system
-
Check if version is 9.7.xCompare the installed version against the affected range: if it starts with 9.7 (such as 9.7, 9.7P1, 9.7P2, up to 9.7P12), the system is affectedAffected if The version is 9.7.x and is earlier than 9.7P13
-
Check if version is 9.8.xCompare the installed version against the affected range: if it starts with 9.8 (such as 9.8, 9.8P1, 9.8P2), the system is affectedAffected if The version is 9.8.x and is earlier than 9.8P3
-
Check if version is prior to 9.7If the installed version is any release prior to 9.7 (such as 9.6, 9.5, 9.4, etc.), it falls within the '< 9.7' affected rangeAffected if The version is any release earlier than 9.7
A system is affected if it runs Clustered Data ONTAP version 9.7.x before P13, 9.8.x before P3, or any version prior to 9.7.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data9.7
Upgrade Clustered Data ONTAP to version 9.7P13, 9.8P3, or later to patch the vulnerability.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26994 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26994 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data