CVE-2021-27001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClustered Data ONTAP versions 9.x prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7 and 9.9.1P2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated privileged local attacker to arbitrarily modify Compliance-mode WORM data prior to the end of the retention period.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.x prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7 and 9.9.1P2, an authenticated privileged local attacker can bypass WORM (Write Once Read Many) compliance controls to arbitrarily modify Compliance-mode WORM data before its scheduled retention period expires, violating data immutability guarantees.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0, <= 9.4= 9.5= 9.6= 9.7= 9.8= 9.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check ONTAP versionRun the command 'version' in the ONTAP CLI (system node run -node * -command version) or view the version in System Manager under Cluster > OverviewAffected if The version is 9.0 through 9.4, 9.5 (any patch before P18), 9.6 (any patch before P16), 9.7 (any patch before P16), 9.8 (any patch before P7), or 9.9.1 (any patch before P2)
-
Confirm WORM Compliance is in useCheck if Compliance-mode WORM files orSnapLock volumes exist using 'volume show -fields snaplock-type' or 'vserver show' for SnapLock configurationAffected if SnapLock volumes with compliance-mode are configured or WORM files with scheduled retention periods exist on the system
-
Verify write access controlsReview audit logs for any write operations on WORM-protected files using 'volume audit show' or check storage console logs for write events on SnapLock volumesAffected if Write operations occurred on Compliance-mode WORM files before their scheduled retention expiry, indicating potential bypass
You are affected if your Clustered Data ONTAP version falls within the unpatched ranges AND you have Compliance-mode WORM or SnapLock volumes in use, with evidence of unauthorized writes to immutability-protected data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches (9.5P18, 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7, or 9.9.1P2 or later) to affected ONTAP installations. After patching, audit WORM data integrity to ensure no unauthorized modifications occurred.
Upgrade to 9.5P18 (for 9.5), 9.6P16 (for 9.6), 9.7P16 (for 9.7), 9.8P7 (for 9.8), or 9.9.1P2 (for 9.9.1)
- 1. Identify the current Clustered Data ONTAP version by running: `version`
- 2. Determine the appropriate target patch version based on your current major version: 9.5P18, 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7, or 9.9.1P2
- 3. Review NetApp's upgrade pre-check requirements and ensure adequate storage space for the upgrade
- 4. Create a backup or snapshot of the system as a precaution before upgrading
- 5. Download the appropriate patch from the NetApp Support Site
- 6. Use the `system node image modify` and `system node upgrade` commands, or perform the upgrade via System Manager
- 7. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the version with `version`
- 8. Confirm the WORM compliance functionality is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data