CVE-2021-29082
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain NETGEAR devices are affected by disclosure of sensitive information. This affects RBW30 before 2.6.1.4, RBS40V before 2.6.1.4, RBK752 before 3.2.15.25, RBK753 before 3.2.15.25, RBK753S before 3.2.15.25, RBK754 before 3.2.15.25, RBR750 before 3.2.15.25, RBS750 before 3.2.15.25, RBK852 before 3.2.15.25, RBK853 before 3.2.15.25, RBK854 before 3.2.15.25, RBR850 before 3.2.15.25, and RBS850 before 3.2.15.25.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInformation disclosure vulnerability in NETGEAR Orbi mesh WiFi systems (RBW30, RBS40V, RBK752/753/753S/754, RBR750, RBS750, RBK852/853/854, RBR850, RBS850) allowing unauthorized access to sensitive information. The specific attack vector and nature of exposed data are not detailed in the available advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.6.1.4< 2.6.1.4< 3.2.15.25< 3.2.15.25< 3.2.15.25< 3.2.15.25< 3.2.15.25< 3.2.15.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Orbi device modelLocate the model number on the device label or check the admin web interface (usually at 192.168.1.1) under the Router Status or About sectionAffected if The model is one of: RBW30, RBS40V, RBK752, RBK753, RBK753S, RBK754, RBR750, or RBS750
-
Determine the current firmware versionIn the router admin web interface, navigate to Administration > Firmware Update or Router/About page and note the displayed firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is not visible in the admin interface
-
Compare RBW30/RBS40V firmware to thresholdIf your model is RBW30 or RBS40V, compare your installed firmware version against 2.6.1.4 - versions below 2.6.1.4 are affectedAffected if Your installed version is lower than 2.6.1.4 on an RBW30 or RBS40V device
-
Compare RBK/RBR/RBS series firmware to thresholdIf your model is RBK752, RBK753, RBK753S, RBK754, RBR750, or RBS750, compare your installed firmware version against 3.2.15.25 - versions below 3.2.15.25 are affectedAffected if Your installed version is lower than 3.2.15.25 on any of these models
You are affected if your Orbi device model matches RBW30, RBS40V, RBK752, RBK753, RBK753S, RBK754, RBR750, or RBS750 and your current firmware version is below the corresponding threshold (2.6.1.4 for RBW30/RBS40V, 3.2.15.25 for the others).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.6.1.43.2.15.25
Apply vendor-supplied firmware updates: version 2.6.1.4 or later for RBW30/RBS40V, and version 3.2.15.25 or later for RBK/RBR/RBS series devices.
Firmware 2.6.1.4 for Rbw30/Rbs40v; Firmware 3.2.15.25 for Rbk752/Rbk753/Rbk753s/Rbk754/Rbr750/Rbs750
- Identify the exact model number of your NETGEAR device (Rbw30, Rbs40v, Rbk752, Rbk753, Rbk753s, Rbk754, Rbr750, or Rbs750)
- Navigate to the NETGEAR support page at kb.netgear.com and locate the downloads/support page for your specific model
- Download the firmware version 2.6.1.4 if your device is Rbw30 or Rbs40v
- Download the firmware version 3.2.15.25 if your device is Rbk752, Rbk753, Rbk753s, Rbk754, Rbr750, or Rbs750
- Access your router or mesh system's web interface (typically at routerlogin.net or 192.168.1.1)
- Locate the firmware update section (usually under Administration > Firmware Update or similar)
- Upload and apply the downloaded firmware file
- Wait for the device to reboot and verify the new firmware version is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29082 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29082 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data