CVE-2021-31849
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLP) ePO extension prior to 11.7.100 allows a remote attacker logged into ePO as an administrator to inject arbitrary SQL into the ePO database through the user management section of the DLP ePO extension.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLP) ePO extension's user management section allows an authenticated ePO administrator to inject arbitrary SQL commands into the underlying ePO database. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 11.7.100.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.6.0, < 11.6.400>= 11.7.0, < 11.7.100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify McAfee DLP ePO extension is installedLog into the ePO console and navigate to Server Settings > Extensions > Installed Extensions, or check the extension management page for any installed extensions with name containing 'Data Loss Prevention' or 'DLPE'.Affected if The DLP ePO extension is not listed in installed extensions.
-
Determine the installed version of the DLP ePO extensionIn the ePO console, click on the DLP extension entry in the Extensions page to view its version details. The version is typically displayed as a four-part number (e.g., 11.7.0.x).Affected if Unable to retrieve version information from the ePO console.
-
Compare the installed version against affected rangesReview the version number found in the previous step. Affected versions are: 11.6.0 through 11.6.399 (inclusive) AND 11.7.0 through 11.7.99 (inclusive). Versions 11.6.400 and above, and 11.7.100 and above, are not affected.Affected if The installed version falls within 11.6.0 to 11.6.399 or 11.7.0 to 11.7.99.
-
Confirm user management functionality is accessibleIn the ePO console, navigate to the DLP section and verify that the User Management or Administration sub-section is accessible. This is the specific component where the SQL injection vulnerability exists.Affected if The user management section is accessible in the DLP ePO extension interface.
If the McAfee DLP ePO extension is installed and its version falls within 11.6.0-11.6.399 or 11.7.0-11.7.99 with the user management section accessible, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.6.40011.7.100
Upgrade McAfee DLP ePO extension to version 11.7.100 or later to obtain the vendor patch that addresses the SQL injection vulnerability.
11.6.400 or 11.7.100 (or later)
- 1. Confirm current DLP ePO extension version through ePO console under Menu > Software > Software Catalog or Menu > Server Settings > Data Loss Prevention
- 2. Download the fixed DLP ePO extension version (11.6.400 or 11.7.100 or later) from the McAfee ServicePortal at support.mcafee.com or kc.mcafee.com
- 3. Navigate to Menu > Software > Software Management > Extensions in ePO console
- 4. Import the new DLP ePO extension package using the Import Extension option
- 5. Follow the on-screen upgrade wizard to complete the installation
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the DLP ePO extension version in the console
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31849 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31849 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data