Remote Cap\/prx FirmwareOperating system · Sitel Sa

CVE-2021-32456

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SITEL CAP/PRX firmware version 5.2.01 allows an attacker with access to the local network of the device to obtain the authentication passwords by analysing the network traffic.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SITEL CAP/PRX firmware version 5.2.01 transmits authentication passwords in cleartext or with weak encoding over the network, allowing any attacker with local network access to capture and analyze network traffic to recover the credentials.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched firmware version. If no patch is available, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the device and consider additional authentication controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Remote Cap\/prx FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 5.2.01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device firmware version
    Access the device management interface or check the device documentation to determine the exact firmware version running on the Sitel CAP/PRX device. This is typically visible in the system information or status page of the device web interface or CLI.
    Affected if The firmware version is exactly 5.2.01
  2. Confirm the device model
    Verify that the device is a Sitel Sa Remote Cap or PRX model. Check the device label, web interface, or CLI output for the model identifier.
    Affected if The device is a Sitel CAP/PRX model running firmware version 5.2.01
  3. Capture network traffic from the device
    Use a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the same network segment as the device to capture outgoing network traffic during authentication. Analyze the captured packets for plaintext or weakly encoded password strings.
    Affected if Authentication traffic contains passwords transmitted in cleartext or with weak encoding (e.g., base64, simple XOR) rather than secure encryption
  4. Verify network accessibility
    Determine if the device is reachable over the network from segments other than trusted management networks. Check if the device management interface is exposed to untrusted network segments.
    Affected if The device is accessible from network segments where untrusted users or devices exist, allowing them to capture authentication traffic

A user is affected if they are running Sitel CAP/PRX firmware version 5.2.01 and the device transmits authentication credentials without proper encryption on an accessible network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched firmware version. If no patch is available, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the device and consider additional authentication controls.

Fix this in Remote Cap\/prx Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32456 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32456 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data