CVE-2021-32977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAVEVA System Platform versions 2017 through 2020 R2 P01 does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAVEVA System Platform versions 2017 through 2020 R2 P01 fails to properly verify cryptographic signatures on data, allowing potentially tampered or malicious data to be accepted by the system due to missing or incorrect signature validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2017, < 2020= 2020CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AVEVA System Platform versionLocate the installation directory or check Windows Programs and Features for 'AVEVA System Platform' and note the exact version number (such as 2017, 2017 R2, 2019, 2020, or 2020 R2)Affected if The installed version is 2017, 2018, 2019, or 2020 (any release) since these all lack proper cryptographic signature validation
-
Determine if data import or external data feeding is configuredReview system configuration for any data import features, OPC connections, external data sources, or data exchange modules that bring external data into the AVEVA environmentAffected if The system imports or accepts data from external sources without additional integrity controls
-
Check for disabled or missing signature validation settingsExamine the security or data handling configuration files and settings within AVEVA System Platform related to cryptographic verification, digital signatures, or data integrity checksAffected if Signature validation is disabled, not configured, or missing from the data handling settings
-
Inspect network exposure of data ingestion interfacesReview network configuration to identify if the system's data import interfaces (such as OPC servers, data exchange ports, or import utilities) are exposed to untrusted network segmentsAffected if Data ingestion interfaces are accessible on open or untrusted networks without additional integrity validation
A user is affected if they have AVEVA System Platform version 2017 through 2020 installed and the system is configured to accept external data imports without supplementary integrity verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2020
Upgrade to a patched version of AVEVA System Platform beyond 2020 R2 P01. Until then, implement additional integrity checks on data imports and restrict network access to reduce attack surface.
2020 R2 P02 or later (contact AVEVA for specific fixed release)
- Verify current AVEVA System Platform version by checking the installed version in Control Studio or through the Windows Programs and Features list
- Contact AVEVA customer support to obtain the appropriate patch or upgrade to a fixed release
- Plan upgrade during a scheduled maintenance window to minimize operational impact
- Before upgrading, back up all current configurations, projects, and historical data
- Apply the upgrade following AVEVA's official installation documentation
- After upgrade, verify that all signature verification mechanisms are functioning correctly
- Validate that all existing projects and integrations operate as expected in the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data