KeycloakApplication · Redhat

CVE-2021-3513

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-08-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 13.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in keycloak where a brute force attack is possible even when the permanent lockout feature is enabled. This is due to a wrong error message displayed when wrong credentials are entered. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Keycloak's permanent account lockout feature can be bypassed due to an incorrect error message being displayed during authentication failures. This allows attackers to perform unlimited brute force password guessing even on accounts that should be permanently locked out, primarily impacting confidentiality through unauthorized access.

MitigationApply Keycloak security patches for this vulnerability, and consider implementing additional controls like CAPTCHA, rate limiting at the proxy level, or enabling multi-factor authentication as compensating controls until the patch is deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
KeycloakApplication
Affected:< 13.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Keycloak version
    Run 'kc.sh --version' or check the Keycloak server startup logs for the version number
    Affected if The installed version is Redhat Keycloak below version 13.0.0
  2. Verify permanent lockout is configured
    Access Keycloak admin console, navigate to Authentication > Password Policy, and check if a permanent lockout (brute force) policy is enabled
    Affected if Permanent account lockout policy is set for user accounts
  3. Test authentication failure error messages
    Attempt multiple failed login attempts on a permanently locked account and observe the error message returned
    Affected if The error message does not clearly indicate the account is permanently locked, or allows further authentication attempts to proceed
  4. Check brute force protection status
    Review authentication flow configurations in Keycloak for any brute force or account lockout failure counters
    Affected if Brute force protection appears to not be enforcing permanent lockout as expected or error handling differs from expected behavior

A user is affected if they are running Redhat Keycloak below version 13.0.0 with permanent lockout enabled, and the authentication failure response allows unlimited password guessing attempts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 13.0.0 or later
Fixed in 13.0.0
Interim mitigation

Apply Keycloak security patches for this vulnerability, and consider implementing additional controls like CAPTCHA, rate limiting at the proxy level, or enabling multi-factor authentication as compensating controls until the patch is deployed.

Recommended fix High confidence

Keycloak 13.0.0

  1. Upgrade Keycloak to version 13.0.0 or later to resolve the brute force protection bypass vulnerability
  2. After upgrade, verify that the permanent lockout feature is functioning correctly by testing with incorrect credentials
  3. Confirm that proper error messages are displayed when permanent lockout is triggered, ensuring no information leakage that could aid brute force attacks
Caveat Review Keycloak 13.0.0 release notes for any breaking changes or migration requirements from your current version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Keycloak Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3513 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data