CVE-2021-37219
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.10.1 Raft RPC layer allows non-server agents with a valid certificate signed by the same CA to access server-only functionality, enabling privilege escalation. Fixed in 1.8.15, 1.9.9 and 1.10.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in HashiCorp Consul's Raft RPC layer where authorization checks are improperly enforced. Non-server agents (client agents) possessing a valid certificate signed by the same certificate authority as server nodes can bypass access controls and invoke server-only RPC functionality, resulting in privilege escalation from client to server-level permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.8.15>= 1.9.0, < 1.9.9>= 1.10.0, < 1.10.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Consul versionRun `consul --version` or check the version of the Consul package installed in your environmentAffected if The installed version falls within < 1.8.15, >= 1.9.0 and < 1.9.9, or >= 1.10.0 and < 1.10.2
-
Determine agent roleCheck the Consul agent configuration for the `server` parameter in the configuration file or run `consul info` and look for the `server` attribute in the agent outputAffected if The agent is running as a client agent (server = false) rather than a server node
-
Verify certificate configurationExamine the Consul agent configuration for TLS/SSL settings, specifically the `ca_file` or `cert_file` parameters to determine if certificates are signed by the same internal certificate authority used by server nodesAffected if Client agents are using certificates signed by the same internal CA as Consul server nodes
-
Assess RPC interface exposureCheck network configuration to determine if the Raft RPC port (default 8300) is accessible from client agents or untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules and Consul agent bind addressesAffected if Client agents have network access to the Raft RPC interface on server nodes
Your environment is affected if you are running a Consul client agent with a version in the vulnerable range that uses certificates signed by the same CA as your server nodes and has network access to the Raft RPC interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.8.151.9.91.10.2
Upgrade Consul to version 1.8.15, 1.9.9, 1.10.2 or later to remediate the Raft RPC authorization bypass. For environments unable to upgrade immediately, review certificate-based access policies and consider network segmentation to limit client agent access to RPC interfaces.
Upgrade to Consul 1.10.2 (or 1.9.9 if staying on 1.9.x, or 1.8.15 if staying on 1.8.x)
- 1. Identify current Consul version by running 'consul version' or checking the systemd service
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version (see upgrade_path)
- 3. Review HashiCorp Consul upgrade documentation at https://www.consul.io/docs/upgrading
- 4. Take a snapshot of Consul state using 'consul snapshot save' before upgrading
- 5. Stop the Consul service on all nodes in the cluster
- 6. Upgrade Consul package to the fixed version (1.8.15, 1.9.9, or 1.10.2) using package manager or manual binary replacement
- 7. Start Consul service on server agents first, then client agents
- 8. Verify cluster health using 'consul members' and 'consul operator raft list-peers'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-37219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-37219 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data