CVE-2021-4157
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out of memory bounds write flaw (1 or 2 bytes of memory) in the Linux kernel NFS subsystem was found in the way users use mirroring (replication of files with NFS). A user, having access to the NFS mount, could potentially use this flaw to crash the system or escalate privileges on the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability (1-2 bytes) in the Linux kernel NFS subsystem related to file mirroring/replication operations. A user with access to an NFS mount can write beyond intended memory bounds, potentially crashing the system or achieving privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 4.4.269>= 4.5, < 4.9.269>= 4.10, < 4.14.233>= 4.15, < 4.19.191>= 4.20, < 5.4.120>= 5.5, < 5.10.38>= 5.11, < 5.11.22>= 5.12, < 5.12.5= 35all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the running Linux kernel versionRun `uname -r` or check `/proc/version` to obtain the kernel version. Compare it against the affected ranges: < 4.4.269, >= 4.5 and < 4.9.269, >= 4.10 and < 4.14.233, >= 4.15 and < 4.19.191, >= 4.20 and < 5.4.120, >= 5.5 and < 5.10.38, >= 5.11 and < 5.11.22, >= 5.12 and < 5.12.5Affected if The kernel version falls within any of these ranges and the system uses NFS functionality
-
Determine if NFS is mounted or in useRun `mount | grep nfs` or `showmount -e` to check for active NFS mounts or exports. Also check `nfsstat -c` or review /proc/fs/nfsfs/ for NFS client/server activityAffected if NFS shares are mounted or the system is acting as an NFS server or client
-
Identify the operating system distribution and versionCheck the OS by running `cat /etc/os-release` or `hostnamectl`. For Fedora systems, verify if the version is 35Affected if The system is Fedora 35 regardless of kernel version, or if running an affected kernel on any Fedora release
-
Check if this is a NetApp H-series storage systemIf the target is a NetApp H300e, H300s, H500e, H500s, H700e, or H700s device, check the firmware version via the NetApp hardware management interface or run `sysctl -a` or check /var/log for firmware identification detailsAffected if The device is any of the NetApp H-series models listed (H300e, H300s, H500e, H500s, H700e, H700s) regardless of firmware version
A system is affected if it runs a Linux kernel within the specified version ranges AND uses NFS, or if it runs Fedora 35, or if it is a NetApp H-series device (all firmware versions).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.2694.9.2694.14.233
Apply the relevant Linux kernel security patches for this NFS subsystem vulnerability. Restrict NFS mount access to trusted users and systems to reduce the attack surface until patching can be completed.
Linux Kernel 4.4.269+, 4.9.269+, 4.14.233+, or 4.19.191+ (or a later stable release such as 5.x)
- Check current kernel version: uname -r
- Update package repository metadata: dnf check-update (or apt-get update for Debian-based)
- Install the updated kernel package: dnf update kernel (or apt-get install linux-image-<version>)
- Verify the new kernel package is installed: rpm -qa | grep kernel
- Reboot the system to load the fixed kernel: systemctl reboot
- After reboot, verify the system is running the fixed kernel: uname -r
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-4157 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-4157 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data