Ufida Product Lifecycle ManagementApplication · Yonyou

CVE-2021-41744

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-10-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
All versions of yongyou PLM are affected by a command injection issue. UFIDA PLM (Product Life Cycle Management) is a strategic management method. It applies a series of enterprise application systems to support the entire process from conceptual design to the end of product life, and the collaborative creation, distribution, application and management of product information across organizations. Yonyou PLM uses jboss by default, and you can access the management control background without authorization An attacker can use this vulnerability to gain server permissions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Yongyou PLM contains a command injection vulnerability in all versions, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the server. The issue is compounded by the default exposure of the JBoss management console without authentication, enabling direct access to the management interface.

MitigationRestrict access to the JBoss management console and implement proper authentication. Additionally, sanitize and validate all user inputs to prevent command injection attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ufida Product Lifecycle ManagementApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify exposed JBoss management ports
    Scan your network for open ports 9990, 9999, or 8080 which commonly host the JBoss management console. Use 'netstat -an | grep -E "(9990|9999|8080)" or nmap -p 9990,9999,8080 <target>
    Affected if Any of these management ports are open and accessible from an untrusted network
  2. Verify management console authentication
    Attempt to access the JBoss management interface at http://<host>:9990/ or http://<host>:9999/ and observe whether a login prompt appears before access is granted
    Affected if The management console grants access without requiring valid credentials
  3. Check for default JBoss endpoints
    Probe for unauthenticated access to /jmx-console or /web-console paths on your JBoss server. Trycurl -I http://<host>:8080/jmx-console/
    Affected if These endpoints respond without authentication or return administrative interfaces
  4. Confirm PLM application exposure
    Identify if the Yongyou PLM application is directly accessible on the network and determine what JBoss version it runs on, if possible
    Affected if The PLM web interface is exposed without network-level access controls
  5. Review firewall rules for management interfaces
    Examine host-based and network firewall rules to determine if management ports (9990, 9999) are blocked from external access. Check iptables, Windows Firewall, or cloud security groups
    Affected if Firewall rules permit untrusted source IPs to reach JBoss management ports

If the JBoss management console is network-accessible without authentication, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict access to the JBoss management console and implement proper authentication. Additionally, sanitize and validate all user inputs to prevent command injection attacks.

Fix this in Ufida Product Lifecycle Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41744 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41744 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data