RancherApplication · Suse

CVE-2021-4200

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.5.13 / 2.6.4 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in SUSE Rancher allows write access to the Catalog for any user when restricted-admin role is enabled. This issue affects: SUSE Rancher Rancher versions prior to 2.5.13; Rancher versions prior to 2.6.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper privilege management in SUSE Rancher allows users with the restricted-admin role to retain write access to the Catalog, bypassing the intended restrictions of that role. The restricted-admin role is supposed to limit privileges, but the vulnerability permits catalog write operations that should be blocked.

MitigationUpgrade Rancher to version 2.5.13 or later (for the 2.5.x branch) or 2.6.4 or later (for the 2.6.x branch) to remediate this improper privilege management issue.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RancherApplication
Affected:< 2.5.13>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine Rancher version
    Access the Rancher UI, go to the settings or about page, or use the kubectl command to query the Rancher version. Alternatively, check the Helm chart version if deployed via Helm.
    Affected if The installed version is less than 2.5.13, or greater than or equal to 2.6.0 but less than 2.6.4
  2. Identify restricted-admin role usage
    In the Rancher UI, navigate to Users and Authentication, then review all users and their assigned roles. Look for any users assigned the 'restricted-admin' role.
    Affected if Any user account is assigned the restricted-admin role
  3. Verify catalog write access for restricted-admin
    As a user with restricted-admin role, attempt to add, modify, or delete a catalog in Rancher (Global Apps > Catalogs > Add Catalog). Alternatively, review the role permissions configuration for restricted-admin to confirm write access to catalog resources is present.
    Affected if Users with restricted-admin role can perform write operations on catalogs when they should not be able to

A user is affected if running a vulnerable Rancher version AND any user with restricted-admin role can perform catalog write operations that should be blocked by that role.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.5.13 / 2.6.4 or later
Fixed in 2.5.132.6.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Rancher to version 2.5.13 or later (for the 2.5.x branch) or 2.6.4 or later (for the 2.6.x branch) to remediate this improper privilege management issue.

Recommended fix High confidence

Rancher 2.5.13 or 2.6.4 (depending on your release line)

  1. Backup your Rancher installation and data before proceeding with any upgrade
  2. Upgrade Rancher to version 2.5.13 if you are on the 2.5.x release line
  3. Upgrade Rancher to version 2.6.4 if you are on the 2.6.x release line
  4. After upgrade, verify that users with restricted-admin role no longer have write access to the Catalog
  5. Confirm the upgrade was successful by checking the Rancher UI and verifying normal functionality
Caveat Review Rancher upgrade documentation for your specific version path for any migration considerations

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Rancher Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-4200 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-4200 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data