CVE-2021-43410
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Airavata Django Portal allows CRLF log injection because of lack of escaping log statements. In particular, some HTTP request parameters are logged without first being escaped. Versions affected: master branch before commit 3c5d8c7 [1] of airavata-django-portal [1] https://github.com/apache/airavata-django-portal/commit/3c5d8c72bfc3eb0af8693a655a5d60f9273f8170
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceApache Airavata Django Portal contains a CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) injection vulnerability in log statements where HTTP request parameters are logged without proper escaping or sanitization. This allows attackers to inject arbitrary content into log files by including CRLF characters in request parameters, potentially enabling log poisoning attacks or injection of false log entries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2021-12-06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Apache Airavata Django PortalCheck the installed package version using 'pip show airavata-django-portal' or inspect the requirements.txt file for the airavata-django-portal package versionAffected if The version is earlier than the 2021-12-06 release or the version cannot be determined (indicating an older installation)
-
Verify logging is enabled in the Django portalInspect the Django settings file (settings.py) for LOGGING configuration and confirm that logging handlers and loggers are activeAffected if Logging is enabled and configured to write to file or console outputs
-
Locate log statements that capture HTTP request parametersSearch the codebase for logging statements that include request parameters, such as logger.info(), logger.debug(), or logging calls that reference request.GET, request.POST, or request parameters directlyAffected if Log statements exist that write user-supplied request parameters without sanitization
-
Inspect the logging code for proper escaping of user inputExamine the identified logging statements to determine if request parameters are passed through an escaping function (such as str() or repr()) or sanitization method before being written to logsAffected if Request parameters are logged directly without any escaping or sanitization applied
You are affected if you are running Apache Airavata Django Portal with a version prior to 2021-12-06 and your logging configuration captures HTTP request parameters without escaping them, allowing CRLF injection in log files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2021-12-06
Apply the fix from commit 3c5d8c7 which implements proper escaping of HTTP request parameters before logging. Review all log statements in the codebase to ensure any user-supplied input is sanitized before being written to logs.
Master branch after commit 3c5d8c7 (released circa 2021-12-06)
- 1. Clone or pull the latest Apache Airavata Django Portal repository
- 2. Navigate to the airavata-django-portal directory
- 3. Checkout or ensure you're on the master branch at commit 3c5d8c72bfc3eb0af8693a655a5d60f9273f8170 or later: git checkout 3c5d8c72bfc3eb0af8693a655a5d60f9273f8170
- 4. Alternatively, pull the latest master branch which contains the fix: git pull origin master
- 5. Verify the fix by reviewing the commit changes to ensure log statements now properly escape HTTP request parameters
- 6. Redeploy the portal application with the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43410 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43410 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data