CVE-2021-43834
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedeLabFTW is an electronic lab notebook manager for research teams. In versions prior to 4.2.0 there is a vulnerability which allows an attacker to authenticate as an existing user, if that user was created using a single sign-on authentication option such as LDAP or SAML. It impacts instances where LDAP or SAML is used for authentication instead of the (default) local password mechanism. Users should upgrade to at least version 4.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceeLabFTW versions before 4.2.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the SSO authentication flow (LDAP/SAML). Attackers can impersonate existing users who were created via SSO login by exploiting improper validation in the authentication mechanism, achieving unauthorized access without knowing the user's credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed eLabFTW versionAccess the admin dashboard or check the version file in the installation directory. The version is typically visible in the footer of web pages or via the admin panel.Affected if The installed version is any version before 4.2.0 (e.g., 4.1.x, 4.0.x, earlier releases).
-
Determine if LDAP authentication is enabledReview the eLabFTW configuration files or access the 'Authentication' section in the admin panel to check whether LDAP integration is configured and active.Affected if LDAP authentication method is enabled and in use on the instance.
-
Determine if SAML authentication is enabledReview the eLabFTW configuration files or access the 'Authentication' section in the admin panel to check whether SAML single sign-on is configured and active.Affected if SAML authentication method is enabled and in use on the instance.
-
Identify users created via SSO loginQuery the user database or user management interface to identify accounts that were created through LDAP or SAML authentication flows (typically indicated by authentication source field).Affected if Any user accounts exist that were created via LDAP or SAML login, as these accounts could be impersonated through the vulnerability.
You are affected if your eLabFTW installation version is below 4.2.0 AND you have LDAP or SAML authentication enabled with SSO-created user accounts present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.0
Upgrade eLabFTW to version 4.2.0 or later. Until then, consider disabling SSO authentication methods and using local password authentication only, or implement additional access controls on affected instances.
4.2.0
- 1. Back up the current eLabFTW installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Consult the official eLabFTW upgrade documentation for your specific installation method (Docker, manual, or package manager).
- 3. Upgrade eLabFTW to version 4.2.0 or later using the appropriate method for your deployment.
- 4. After upgrade, verify that the authentication mechanism is functioning correctly for all user types, especially LDAP and SAML users.
- 5. Confirm the installed version matches or exceeds 4.2.0 by checking the admin panel or using the CLI tools.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43834 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43834 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data