CVE-2024-25632
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedeLabFTW is an open source electronic lab notebook for research labs. In the context of eLabFTW, an administrator is a user account with certain privileges to manage users and content in their assigned team/teams. A user may be an administrator in one team and a regular user in another. The vulnerability allows a regular user to become administrator of a team where they are a member, under a reasonable configuration. Additionally, in eLabFTW versions subsequent to v5.0.0, the vulnerability may allow an initially unauthenticated user to gain administrative privileges over an arbitrary team. The vulnerability does not affect system administrator status. Users should upgrade to version 5.1.0. System administrators are advised to turn off local user registration, saml_team_create and not allow administrators to import users into teams, unless strictly required.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in eLabFTW electronic lab notebook software. The flaw allows a regular team member to elevate their privileges to team administrator within teams they belong to. In versions after v5.0.0, an unauthenticated attacker can potentially gain administrative privileges over arbitrary teams through insecure handling of user registration or team creation mechanisms. The vulnerability stems from broken access control in the team administration privilege assignment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.6.0, < 5.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed eLabFTW versionLocate the version number through the web interface (typically in the footer or About page) or check the installed package/version file in the eLabFTW installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 4.6.0 or higher but lower than 5.1.0
-
Verify if local user registration is enabledCheck the eLabFTW configuration settings for any option that controls local/user-based account creation or self-registrationAffected if Local user registration is enabled and the installed version is in the affected range
-
Verify if saml_team_create functionality is accessibleCheck the SAML configuration or team creation settings for any feature allowing team creation via SAML identity providerAffected if The saml_team_create feature is enabled or accessible and the installed version is after v5.0.0
-
Verify if user import functionality is accessibleCheck for any admin-imported user functionality or bulk user creation feature in the configuration or admin panelAffected if User import capabilities are available and the installed version is after v5.0.0
You are affected if your eLabFTW installation version is 4.6.0 or higher but lower than 5.1.0, and any of the following are true: local user registration is enabled, saml_team_create is accessible, or user import functionality is available (especially in versions after 5.0.0 where unauthenticated exploitation is possible).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.0
Upgrade to eLabFTW version 5.1.0. Alternatively, if immediate upgrade is not possible, disable local user registration, disable saml_team_create setting, and restrict administrators from importing users into teams.
5.1.0
- 1. Back up your eLabFTW installation and database before upgrading.
- 2. Upgrade eLabFTW to version 5.1.0 or later following the official upgrade documentation.
- 3. As additional hardening, configure the following in your settings: set 'Allow local registration' to disabled, set 'saml_team_create' to disabled, and restrict administrators from importing users into teams.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25632 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data