CVE-2021-45487
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn NetBSD through 9.2, the IPv4 ID generation algorithm does not use appropriate cryptographic measures.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe IPv4 identification (ID) field generation in the NetBSD kernel uses a predictable algorithm instead of cryptographically secure random values. This allows remote attackers to conduct traffic analysis, infer internal network state, or potentially inject malicious fragments by guessing ID values.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm NetBSD is the operating systemRun 'uname -a' and verify the operating system name is NetBSDAffected if The system is not running NetBSD (this CVE only affects NetBSD)
-
Check the NetBSD versionRun 'uname -r' to get the release version, or 'uname -v' to get the version stringAffected if The version is 9.2 or earlier (e.g., 9.0, 8.x, 7.x)
-
Verify IPv4 is enabled on the systemCheck for active IPv4 interfaces using 'ifconfig -a' or 'ip addr show', looking for inet (IPv4) addresses configuredAffected if No IPv4 interfaces are configured or IPv4 is completely disabled (the vulnerability only affects IPv4 traffic)
-
Check if the system processes external IPv4 trafficReview firewall rules ('ipfstat' or 'pfctl -sr' on NetBSD) or network configuration to determine if the system routes, forwards, or processes IPv4 packets from other hostsAffected if The system handles IPv4 traffic from untrusted sources (the vulnerability enables analysis of outbound IPv4 fragments from this host)
You are affected if the system runs NetBSD version 9.2 or earlier and has IPv4 interfaces configured or processes IPv4 traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch when available; otherwise implement network-level filtering or traffic analysis countermeasures at perimeter devices to mitigate predictable ID-based attacks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-45487 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-45487 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data