CVE-2021-47961
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA plaintext storage of a password vulnerability in Synology SSL VPN Client before 1.4.5-0684 allows remote attackers to access or influence the user's PIN code due to insecure storage. This may lead to unauthorized VPN configuration and potential interception of subsequent VPN traffic when combined with user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Synology SSL VPN Client before version 1.4.5-0684 stores user PIN codes in plaintext or with insufficient protection, allowing remote attackers who can access the client system to retrieve these credentials. Combined with user interaction, this enables unauthorized VPN configuration changes and potential traffic interception.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.4.5-0684CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Synology SSL VPN Client is installedCheck the system for the presence of Synology SSL VPN Client application files or registry entries. Common locations include Program Files directories on Windows or Application folders on macOS. Use system inventory or software listing tools to confirm installation.Affected if The Synology SSL VPN Client application is found on the system
-
Determine the installed versionLocate the version information for the installed Synology SSL VPN Client. This is typically available through the application UI (Help > About), or by checking file properties of the main executable. Compare the version number against 1.4.5-0684.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.4.5-0684
-
Inspect credential storage locationExamine the application data directory for the Synology SSL VPN Client. Look for configuration files, preference files, or credential stores where PIN codes might be saved. Check if these files contain plaintext PIN codes or use weak/obfuscated storage rather than proper encryption.Affected if PIN codes or VPN credentials are found stored in plaintext or with weak protection in application data directories
-
Review VPN configuration for unauthorized changesAudit the current VPN configuration profiles managed by the Synology SSL VPN Client. Check for any unexpected server addresses, altered authentication settings, or new configuration profiles that were not created by the legitimate administrator.Affected if VPN configurations show unexpected changes, new profiles, or connections to unknown servers
A system is affected if Synology SSL VPN Client version lower than 1.4.5-0684 is installed and plaintext or weakly protected PIN codes are present in the application storage area.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.5-0684
Update Synology SSL VPN Client to version 1.4.5-0684 or later, which implements proper encryption for stored credentials. Organizations should also audit VPN configurations for any unauthorized changes after patching.
1.4.5-0684 or later
- Download the latest version of Synology SSL VPN Client (version 1.4.5-0684 or later) from the official Synology website
- Uninstall the current vulnerable version of Synology SSL VPN Client
- Install the updated version 1.4.5-0684 or later
- Re-enter VPN credentials and PIN code as needed after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-47961 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-47961 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data