CVE-2022-0018
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn information exposure vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app on Windows and MacOS where the credentials of the local user account are sent to the GlobalProtect portal when the Single Sign-On feature is enabled in the GlobalProtect portal configuration. This product behavior is intentional and poses no security risk when connecting to trusted GlobalProtect portals configured to use the same Single Sign-On credentials both for the local user account as well as the GlobalProtect login. However when the credentials are different, the local account credentials are inadvertently sent to the GlobalProtect portal for authentication. A third party MITM type of attacker cannot see these credentials in transit. This vulnerability is a concern where the GlobalProtect app is deployed on Bring-your-Own-Device (BYOD) type of clients with private local user accounts or GlobalProtect app is used to connect to different organizations. Fixed versions of GlobalProtect app have an app setting to prevent the transmission of the user's local user credentials to the target GlobalProtect portal regardless of the portal configuration. This issue impacts: GlobalProtect app 5.1 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.1.10 on Windows and MacOS; GlobalProtect app 5.2 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.2.9 on Windows and MacOS This issue does not affect GlobalProtect app on other platforms.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe GlobalProtect app for Windows and MacOS versions prior to 5.1.10 and 5.2.9 inadvertently transmits local user account credentials to the GlobalProtect portal when Single Sign-On is enabled, even when those local credentials differ from the credentials used for GlobalProtect authentication. This affects BYOD scenarios and multi-organization deployments where local account credentials may be different from VPN credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1, < 5.1.10>= 5.2, < 5.2.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GlobalProtect versionOpen the GlobalProtect app, go to the About or Settings section to view the installed version number, or check the Windows Programs and Features list / Mac Applications folder for the GlobalProtect versionAffected if version is 5.1.x below 5.1.10, or 5.2.x below 5.2.9
-
Confirm SSO is enabledIn the GlobalProtect app settings, look for Single Sign-On (SSO) configuration or check the portal configuration settings to verify that SSO authentication is activeAffected if SSO is enabled on the GlobalProtect client
-
Check for local account usageVerify whether the endpoint uses local Windows or Mac user accounts that may differ from the credentials used for GlobalProtect VPN authentication, particularly in BYOD or multi-organization scenariosAffected if local user account credentials exist separately from VPN credentials and are used on the same endpoint
You are affected if GlobalProtect version is below 5.1.10 (for 5.1.x) or below 5.2.9 (for 5.2.x) AND SSO is enabled, causing local credentials to be sent to the GlobalProtect portal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.105.2.9
Upgrade GlobalProtect app to version 5.1.10 or higher (5.2.x to 5.2.9 or higher) and enable the new app setting to prevent transmission of local user credentials to the GlobalProtect portal.
GlobalProtect app 5.1.10 or 5.2.9 (or later) on Windows/MacOS
- Upgrade GlobalProtect app on Windows to version 5.1.10 or later (or 5.2.9 or later)
- Upgrade GlobalProtect app on MacOS to version 5.1.10 or later (or 5.2.9 or later)
- After upgrading, verify the new app setting to prevent transmission of local user credentials is enabled in the GlobalProtect app settings
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-0018 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-0018 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data