CVE-2022-0019
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app on Linux that exposes the hashed credentials of GlobalProtect users that saved their password during previous GlobalProtect app sessions to other local users on the system. The exposed credentials enable a local attacker to authenticate to the GlobalProtect portal or gateway as the target user without knowing of the target user’s plaintext password. This issue impacts: GlobalProtect app 5.1 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.1.10 on Linux. GlobalProtect app 5.2 versions earlier than and including GlobalProtect app 5.2.7 on Linux. GlobalProtect app 5.3 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.3.2 on Linux. This issue does not affect the GlobalProtect app on other platforms.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe GlobalProtect app on Linux stores hashed user credentials in a manner that allows other local users on the same system to read them. A local attacker with standard user access can obtain these stored credential hashes and use them to authenticate to GlobalProtect portals/gateways as the compromised user without knowing the plaintext password.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1, < 5.1.10>= 5.2, <= 5.2.7>= 5.3, < 5.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm GlobalProtect is installed on LinuxRun command: dpkg -l | grep globalprotect or rpm -qa | grep -i globalprotect or which globalprotectAffected if GlobalProtect is not installed on the system
-
Determine installed GlobalProtect versionRun: globalprotect --version or check /usr/lib/globalprotect/ for version info, or look in package manager listingAffected if Version is 5.1.x below 5.1.10, or 5.2.x at 5.2.7 or below, or 5.3.x below 5.3.2
-
Locate stored credential filesSearch for credential storage files in GlobalProtect user config directories, typically under ~/.config/GlobalProtect/ or /etc/globalprotect/Affected if Credential files exist and are readable by any local user (world-readable or group-readable)
-
Verify file permissions on credential storageRun: ls -la on GlobalProtect config directories and files containing 'credential', 'pass', or 'hash' in filenamesAffected if Files are readable by other local users (permissions show 'r--r--r--' or similar world-readable settings)
A user is affected if GlobalProtect version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND credential storage files are accessible to other local users on the same Linux system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.105.3.2
Upgrade GlobalProtect app to version 5.1.10, 5.2.8, or 5.3.2 or later on Linux. Additionally, rotate credentials for users who saved passwords in affected GlobalProtect sessions.
GlobalProtect app 5.1.10, 5.2.8, or 5.3.2 depending on the branch
- 1. Identify the current GlobalProtect app version on the Linux system using the package manager or checking the application version.
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on the current version: if running 5.1.x, upgrade to 5.1.10; if running 5.2.x, upgrade to 5.2.8; if running 5.3.x, upgrade to 5.3.2.
- 3. Obtain the updated GlobalProtect app package from the Palo Alto Networks support portal or official repositories.
- 4. Install the fixed version using the Linux package manager (e.g., dpkg -i or rpm -U) with appropriate privileges.
- 5. Verify the installed version matches the target fixed release (5.1.10, 5.2.8, or 5.3.2).
- 6. Test that the GlobalProtect client functions normally after the update.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-0019 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-0019 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data