CVE-2022-0492
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s cgroup_release_agent_write in the kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c function. This flaw, under certain circumstances, allows the use of the cgroups v1 release_agent feature to escalate privileges and bypass the namespace isolation unexpectedly.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis Linux kernel vulnerability in cgroup_release_agent_write (kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c) allows privilege escalation and container escape via the cgroups v1 release_agent feature, which executes a program when cgroups become empty. Under specific conditions, attackers can leverage this to bypass namespace isolation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.24, < 4.9.301>= 4.10, < 4.14.266>= 4.15, < 4.19.229>= 4.20, < 5.4.177>= 5.5, < 5.10.97>= 5.11, < 5.15.20>= 5.16, < 5.16.6= 5.17= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0= 8.0= 8.2= 8.0= 8.2= 4.0= 8.0= 8.2= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within any of the affected ranges: < 4.9.301, 4.10 to < 4.14.266, 4.15 to < 4.19.229, 4.20 to < 5.4.177, 5.5 to < 5.10.97, 5.11 to < 5.15.20, 5.16 to < 5.16.6, or 5.17.x
-
Verify cgroups v1 is in useCheck `/proc/cgroups` or run `mount | grep cgroup` to see if cgroups v1 is mountedAffected if cgroups v1 (named 'cgroup' in /proc/cgroups) is actively mounted and in use on the system
-
Check for configured release_agentRun `cat /sys/fs/cgroup/*/release_agent 2>/dev/null` to see if any release_agent is set in any cgroupAffected if A release_agent path is configured (non-empty) in any cgroup directory under /sys/fs/cgroup/
-
Verify cgroup write permissionsCheck write permissions on cgroup directories: `ls -la /sys/fs/cgroup/` and inspect whether unprivileged users have write access to cgroup.procs or notify_on_release filesAffected if Unprivileged users have write access to cgroup.procs or can modify notify_on_release in a cgroup where release_agent is enabled
The system is vulnerable if it runs an affected kernel version, uses cgroups v1, and has a release_agent configured with accessible cgroup write permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.9.3014.14.2664.19.229
Disable cgroups v1 release_agent feature in kernel configuration or migrate to cgroups v2 (which lacks this feature). Apply kernel patches if available and ensure release_agent is not exposed in untrusted container environments.
Upgrade to kernel 4.9.301+, 4.14.266+, 4.19.229+, or 5.4.177+ (or receive vendor patches for Debian/RHEL)
- Check current kernel version using 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version'
- Identify which kernel branch you are currently running (e.g., 4.9.x, 4.14.x, 4.19.x, or 5.4.x)
- For upstream kernels: upgrade to version 4.9.301 or later, 4.14.266 or later, 4.19.229 or later, or 5.4.177 or later
- For Debian systems: apply Debian kernel security updates (run 'apt update && apt upgrade' or check DSA-500x for the specific patch)
- For Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems: apply the vendor kernel update via 'yum update' or 'dnf update' for the specific errata
- Reboot the system into the new kernel after applying updates
- Verify the fix by checking that the cgroup v1 release_agent file permissions are properly restricted (e.g., 'ls -la /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.release_agent' should show restrictive permissions)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-0492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-0492 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data