Imagecast XOperating system · Dominionvoting

CVE-2022-1743

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The tested version of Dominion Voting System ImageCast X can be manipulated to cause arbitrary code execution by specially crafted election definition files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to spread malicious code to ImageCast X devices from the EMS.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Dominion Voting System ImageCast X contains a vulnerability where specially crafted election definition files can be manipulated to achieve arbitrary code execution. An attacker who can create malicious election definition files on the Election Management System (EMS) could spread malicious code to ImageCast X devices, compromising the voting terminal software.

MitigationImplement cryptographic validation of election definition files before loading them onto ImageCast X devices, and apply vendor-supplied patches to address the arbitrary code execution vulnerability in the file parsing logic.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Imagecast XOperating system
Affected:all versions= 5.5.10.30= 5.5.10.32

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Physical
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm ImageCast X deployment
    Identify whether your environment contains Dominion ImageCast X voting terminals. Check hardware inventory, asset management records, or physically inspect the devices for the ImageCast X branding/model number.
    Affected if The environment does not contain ImageCast X devices, then this CVE does not apply.
  2. Check installed firmware version
    Access the ImageCast X device system information or firmware version display, typically found in the device settings or boot diagnostics. Compare the version number against 5.5.10.30 and 5.5.10.32, as well as any other versions present in your deployment.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.5.10.30, 5.5.10.32, or any other version - per the CVE all versions are affected.
  3. Verify election definition file import source
    Examine the ImageCast X configuration or the Election Management System (EMS) that provisions the devices. Determine whether the system allows importing election definition files from external sources, removable media, or network locations.
    Affected if The system accepts election definition files from external or removable sources without restriction, the exploitation condition is present.
  4. Inspect file validation configuration
    Review the ImageCast X or EMS settings for any cryptographic validation, digital signature verification, or integrity checking mechanisms applied to election definition files before they are loaded onto the device.
    Affected if No cryptographic validation or signature verification is configured for election definition files, the vulnerability is exploitable.

Your environment is affected if you have ImageCast X devices that load election definition files without cryptographic signature validation, regardless of the specific firmware version installed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement cryptographic validation of election definition files before loading them onto ImageCast X devices, and apply vendor-supplied patches to address the arbitrary code execution vulnerability in the file parsing logic.

Fix this in Imagecast X Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing24.0 h
  • Review / QA12.0 h
60.0 hours of engineering $10,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,384.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-1743 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-1743 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data