Imagecast XOperating system · Dominionvoting

CVE-2022-1744

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Applications on the tested version of Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X can execute code with elevated privileges by exploiting a system level service. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges on a device and/or install malicious code.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X allows applications to exploit a system-level service to execute code with elevated privileges. An attacker with local access could leverage this to gain higher-level permissions on the device.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches or updates to the ImageCast X system. Contact Dominion Voting Systems for specific remediation guidance and ensure any updates are tested in a non-production environment before deployment.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Imagecast XOperating system
Affected:all versions= 5.5.10.30= 5.5.10.32

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Physical
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if ImageCast X software is installed
    Locate and inspect the Dominion ImageCast X application on the system; check for its executable, service, or associated files in typical installation directories or system inventory
    Affected if The system runs Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X software
  2. Determine the installed version
    Use system tools to query the installed version of the ImageCast X software (e.g., check application properties, version file, or installed programs list)
    Affected if The installed version matches 5.5.10.30 or 5.5.10.32, or falls within the range of all versions (the vulnerability affects all versions)
  3. Verify local access exists
    Confirm that unprivileged or standard user accounts can access the ImageCast X system locally
    Affected if An unprivileged local user account has access to the ImageCast X environment
  4. Check for the vulnerable service configuration
    Inspect the ImageCast X configuration for the presence of the system-level service that can be exploited for privilege escalation; examine service permissions and enabled features
    Affected if A system-level service associated with ImageCast X is running with elevated privileges and is accessible to local users
  5. Confirm the exploitation pathway exists
    Review whether applications or scripts within the ImageCast X environment can invoke system-level functions or services to execute code with elevated privileges
    Affected if The ImageCast X application permits execution paths that allow privilege escalation through system services

A user is affected if their system runs Dominion ImageCast X and the vulnerability is present, particularly when local unprivileged users can access the exploitable service configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches or updates to the ImageCast X system. Contact Dominion Voting Systems for specific remediation guidance and ensure any updates are tested in a non-production environment before deployment.

Fix this in Imagecast X Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing24.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
56.0 hours of engineering $9,520
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,232.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-1744 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-1744 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data