CVE-2022-20665
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco StarOS could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted commands to the CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the root user. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to have valid administrative credentials on an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco StarOS CLI allows an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary code with root privileges due to insufficient input validation of CLI commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.22.n6>= 21.23.0, < 21.23.n7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the system is running Cisco StarOSAccess the CLI prompt and run 'show version' or check the CLI banner/startup output for StarOS indicatorsAffected if The system is not running Cisco StarOS, then it is not affected
-
Determine the installed StarOS versionExecute 'show version' or 'show software' in the StarOS CLI to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Unable to retrieve a version number, version detection is inconclusive
-
Compare version against the first affected rangeCheck if the version is less than 21.22.n6. The notation 'n6' refers to a specific sub-version patch - compare your version string against this thresholdAffected if Version is < 21.22.n6, the system is affected
-
Compare version against the second affected rangeCheck if the version is >= 21.23.0 AND < 21.23.n7. The notation 'n7' refers to a specific sub-version patch - compare your version string against this rangeAffected if Version is >= 21.23.0 and < 21.23.n7, the system is affected
-
Verify administrative CLI access exists (context check)Confirm that authenticated administrator access to the StarOS CLI is available. This vulnerability requires an authenticated administrator session to exploitAffected if No authenticated administrator CLI access exists, the exploitation vector is not present though the software version may still be vulnerable
The system is affected if it runs Cisco StarOS with a version in the range < 21.22.n6 OR >= 21.23.0 and < 21.23.n7, and an authenticated administrator can access the CLI.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.22.n621.23.n7
Apply the Cisco-provided patch for StarOS when available, and ensure administrative credentials are tightly controlled and monitored.
StarOS 21.22.n6 or later, or 21.23.n7 or later
- 1. Identify the current StarOS version by running 'show version' or 'show software' in the CLI
- 2. Determine if the current version is affected: versions < 21.22.n6 OR versions >= 21.23.0 and < 21.23.n7
- 3. If affected, schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 4. Download the fixed StarOS release (21.22.n6 or later, or 21.23.n7 or later) from Cisco using valid credentials at tools.cisco.com
- 5. Follow Cisco's standard StarOS upgrade procedure: upload the new image, verify integrity, and reboot the system
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is running with 'show version'
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by ensuring the running version is >= 21.22.n6 or >= 21.23.n7
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20665 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20665 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data