CVE-2022-20685
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Modbus preprocessor of the Snort detection engine could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to an integer overflow while processing Modbus traffic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted Modbus traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the Snort process to hang, causing traffic inspection to stop.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an integer overflow vulnerability in Snort's Modbus preprocessor. When processing specially crafted Modbus traffic, an integer overflow occurs that causes the Snort process to hang, resulting in complete traffic inspection failure. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger this condition by sending malicious Modbus packets through the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.0.4= 3.0.5= 3.0.6= 3.1.0= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 6.2.3= 6.2.3.1= 6.2.3.2= 6.2.3.3= 6.2.3.4= 6.2.3.5= 6.2.3.6= 6.2.3.7= 6.2.3.8= 6.2.3.9= 6.2.3.10= 6.2.3.11= 3.17.0s= 3.17.1s= 16.6.1= 16.6.5= 16.6.6= 16.6.7a= 16.6.9= 16.6.10= 16.12.1a= 16.12.2= 16.12.3= 16.12.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco product running SnortDetermine whether the environment uses Cisco Cyber Vision, Cisco Firepower Threat Defense, or Cisco Unified Threat Defense Snort IPS EngineAffected if The product is any of these three lines and the version matches the affected list
-
Check the installed versionUse the system's version reporting command or interface to obtain the exact installed version numberAffected if The version matches any of: Cyber Vision = 3.0.0 through 3.2.1; Firepower Threat Defense = 6.2.3 through 6.2.3.11; Unified Threat Defense Snort = 3.17.0s, 3.17.1s, 16.6.1, 16.6.5, 16.6.6, 16.6.7a, 16.6.9, 16.6.10, 16.12.1a, 16.12.2, 16.12.3, or 16.12.4
-
Verify Modbus preprocessor is enabledInspect the Snort configuration file or policy settings to confirm the Modbus preprocessor is activeAffected if The Modbus preprocessor is enabled and the version is in the affected list above
-
Check for Modbus traffic inspectionReview the Snort sensor or Cisco device configuration to determine if Modbus protocol inspection is being performedAffected if Modbus traffic inspection is enabled and the Snort version is vulnerable
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed Cisco product versions with the Modbus preprocessor enabled and processing Modbus traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco software update that addresses this vulnerability. No workarounds are available, so patching is the only remediation path.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20685 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20685 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data