CVE-2022-20690
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco Discovery Protocol functionality of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause Cisco Discovery Protocol memory corruption on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to missing length validation checks when processing Cisco Discovery Protocol messages. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an out-of-bounds read of the valid Cisco Discovery Protocol packet data, which could allow the attacker to cause corruption in the internal Cisco Discovery Protocol database of the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) parsing code of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapters. Missing length validation checks allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to send malformed CDP packets that trigger out-of-bounds memory reads, leading to corruption of the internal CDP database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions< 11.2.2< 12.0.1= 12.0.1< 11.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ATA device modelAccess the device web interface or CLI and locate the hardware model number (ATA 190, ATA 191, or ATA 192) in the device status or system information pageAffected if Model is Cisco ATA 190, ATA 191, or ATA 192
-
Determine the installed firmware versionIn the device web interface, go to System > Software or use the CLI command 'show version' to retrieve the firmware version numberAffected if Version is less than 11.2.2 for ATA 191/192, or any version for ATA 190 (including versions 11.2.2, 12.0.1 for ATA 191)
-
Verify CDP is enabled on the deviceAccess the device CLI and run 'show cdp' or check the web interface under the relevant interface settings to see if Cisco Discovery Protocol is actively runningAffected if CDP is enabled and processing packets on any interface
-
Assess network accessibility of CDP serviceFrom a system on the same network segment, use a packet capture tool or CDP-aware discovery tool to verify CDP packets can reach the device interfaceAffected if The device is reachable by an unauthenticated adjacent attacker on the same broadcast domain and CDP is running
The device is affected if it is an ATA 190 (any firmware), an ATA 191 running firmware below 12.0.2 or version 12.0.1, or an ATA 192 running firmware below 11.2.2, AND CDP is enabled and accessible from the adjacent network segment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.2.212.0.1
Apply the Cisco firmware patch when available; as a workaround, consider disabling CDP on vulnerable interfaces if the device supports this configuration.
ATA 191/192: upgrade to firmware 11.2.2 or later; ATA 190: contact Cisco for support
- 1. Identify the specific ATA 190 series model (ATA 190, ATA 191, or ATA 192) from the device label or web interface.
- 2. Access the device web interface by navigating to the device IP address.
- 3. Navigate to Administration > System Software > Software Upgrade or similar path depending on firmware version.
- 4. Download the appropriate firmware from Cisco's software download center (software.cisco.com) - search for Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter.
- 5. Upload the firmware file (11.2.2 or later for ATA 191/192) to the device and initiate the upgrade.
- 6. Wait for the upgrade to complete and the device to reboot automatically.
- 7. Verify the new firmware version in the device web interface under Administration > Device Information.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20690 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20690 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data