CVE-2022-20742
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in an IPsec VPN library of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read or modify data within an IPsec IKEv2 VPN tunnel. This vulnerability is due to an improper implementation of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) ciphers. An attacker in a man-in-the-middle position could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting a sufficient number of encrypted messages across an affected IPsec IKEv2 VPN tunnel and then using cryptanalytic techniques to break the encryption. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to decrypt, read, modify, and re-encrypt data that is transmitted across an affected IPsec IKEv2 VPN tunnel.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA GCM cipher implementation flaw in Cisco ASA and FTD IPsec IKEv2 VPN library allows a MITM attacker to decrypt, read, modify, and re-encrypt VPN traffic by intercepting sufficient encrypted messages and applying cryptanalytic techniques.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.4.0.15>= 6.5.0, < 6.6.5.2>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.2= 7.1.0< 9.12.4.38>= 9.13.0, < 9.14.4>= 9.15.0, < 9.15.1.21>= 9.16.0, < 9.16.2.14>= 9.17.0, < 9.17.1.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device typeRun 'show version' or check the device model to confirm whether the device is a Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) or Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)Affected if Device is not Cisco ASA or FTD - this CVE only applies to those platforms
-
Check the software versionRun 'show version' and locate the running software version (for ASA look for 'Cisco ASA Software', for FTD look for 'Cisco Firepower Threat Defense')Affected if Version falls within any of the affected ranges: ASA < 9.12.4.38, 9.13.0 to < 9.14.4, 9.15.0 to < 9.15.1.21, 9.16.0 to < 9.16.2.14, 9.17.0 to < 9.17.1.7; FTD < 6.4.0.15, 6.5.0 to < 6.6.5.2, 7.0.0 to < 7.0.2, or 7.1.0 exactly
-
Verify IKEv2 VPN is configuredRun 'show crypto ikev2 sa' or 'show running-config crypto' to check for active IKEv2 security associations or IKEv2 crypto configurationAffected if No IKEv2 VPN tunnels are configured - the vulnerability requires active IKEv2 negotiations
-
Confirm GCM cipher is in useRun 'show crypto ipsec sa' or 'show crypto ikev2 sa detail' and look for 'AES-GCM' or 'GCM' in the encryption algorithm column for active IPsec SAsAffected if GCM-based encryption is NOT being used - the flaw is specific to GCM cipher implementations
You are affected if your device is Cisco ASA or FTD, runs a vulnerable version, has IKEv2 VPN configured, and uses GCM encryption for IPsec tunnels.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.0.156.6.5.27.0.2
Apply Cisco-supplied patches for ASA and FTD software; if patches unavailable, consider alternative cipher configurations or additional network controls to reduce MITM exposure.
Upgrade to the fixed release in your current version line (e.g., FTD 6.4.0.15+, 6.6.5.2+, 7.0.2+, 7.1.1+ | ASA 9.12.4.38+, 9.14.4+, 9.15.1.21+, 9.16.2.14+)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco ASA or FTD software version using 'show version' command
- 2. Based on the current version line, determine the appropriate fixed release: For FTD 6.4.x upgrade to 6.4.0.15+, for FTD 6.5.x-6.6.x upgrade to 6.6.5.2+, for FTD 7.0.x upgrade to 7.0.2+, for FTD 7.1.x upgrade to 7.1.1+
- 3. For ASA 9.12.x upgrade to 9.12.4.38+, for ASA 9.13.x-9.14.x upgrade to 9.14.4+, for ASA 9.15.x upgrade to 9.15.1.21+, for ASA 9.16.x upgrade to 9.16.2.14+
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed software image from Cisco.com (requires valid service contract)
- 5. Upload the new image to the device using 'copy' command or through the management interface
- 6. Install the upgrade using 'install' command (FTD) or reload the device with new image (ASA)
- 7. Verify successful installation with 'show version' confirming the new fixed version is running
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20742 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20742 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data