CVE-2022-20762
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Common Execution Environment (CEE) ConfD CLI of Cisco Ultra Cloud Core - Subscriber Microservices Infrastructure (SMI) software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to escalate privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient access control in the affected CLI. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating as a CEE ConfD CLI user and executing a specific CLI command. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access privileged containers with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Cisco Ultra Cloud Core Subscriber Microservices Infrastructure (SMI) Common Execution Environment (CEE) ConfD CLI. An authenticated attacker with standard ConfD CLI credentials can execute a specific CLI command to bypass access controls and gain root access to privileged containers. The vulnerability stems from insufficient access control enforcement in the CLI interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2020.02.2.0, < 2020.02.2.47>= 2020.02.6.0, < 2020.02.7.07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed productConfirm the system is running Cisco Ultra Cloud Core Subscriber Microservices Infrastructure (SMI) and note the exact software version numberAffected if The product is Cisco Ultra Cloud Core SMI and the version falls within >= 2020.02.2.0 to < 2020.02.2.47 OR >= 2020.02.6.0 to < 2020.02.7.07
-
Verify ConfD CLI is accessibleConfirm the ConfD CLI interface is enabled and accessible on the systemAffected if ConfD CLI is enabled and reachable (this is the attack surface for the vulnerability)
-
Check ConfD CLI user accountsReview the ConfD CLI user accounts configured on the system and identify any accounts with standard user credentialsAffected if Standard (non-admin) ConfD CLI user accounts exist - the vulnerability allows authenticated standard users to escalate privileges
-
Verify user privilege levelsExamine the privilege level assigned to ConfD CLI users - the vulnerability allows a standard authenticated user to bypass access controlsAffected if Any ConfD CLI user has less than full administrative privileges, as the flaw permits privilege escalation from standard to root
The environment is affected if ConfD CLI is enabled and the installed version falls within the affected ranges, allowing an authenticated standard user to potentially escalate to root privileges via the CLI bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2020.02.2.472020.02.7.07
Apply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability when available, and review ConfD CLI user permissions to limit exposure until the fix is deployed. Ensure least-privilege principles are followed for CLI user accounts.
2020.02.2.47 or 2020.02.7.07 (or later stable releases)
- 1. Identify the currently installed version of Cisco Ultra Cloud Core Subscriber Microservices Infrastructure
- 2. If running 2020.02.2.x, upgrade to version 2020.02.2.47 or later
- 3. If running 2020.02.6.x or 2020.02.7.x, upgrade to version 2020.02.7.07 or later
- 4. Obtain the upgrade package from Cisco's official distribution channels
- 5. Follow Cisco's standard upgrade procedures for the SMI platform
- 6. After upgrade, verify the CEE ConfD CLI behaves with proper access controls
- 7. Confirm the upgrade was successful and the device is functioning normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20762 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20762 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data