CVE-2022-2081
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in the HCI Modbus TCP function included in the product versions listed above. If the HCI Modbus TCP is enabled and configured, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending a specially crafted message to the RTU500 in a high rate, causing the targeted RTU500 CMU to reboot. The vulnerability is caused by a lack of flood control which eventually if exploited causes an internal stack overflow in the HCI Modbus TCP function.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the HCI Modbus TCP function of Schneider Electric RTU500 CMU devices. The vulnerability stems from missing flood/rate control mechanisms, allowing remote attackers to send high-rate specially crafted Modbus TCP messages that trigger a stack overflow, causing the device to reboot.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.13>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.7>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.3>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.4= 13.3.1>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.13>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.7>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.3>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.4= 13.3.1>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.13>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.7>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.3>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.4= 13.3.1>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.13>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.7>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.3>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.4= 13.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the RTU device modelLocate the physical device or check the device inventory for the model number. The affected models are RTU520, RTU530, RTU540, and RTU560.Affected if The device is not one of these four RTU models.
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the device management interface or use the vendor-provided diagnostic tool to retrieve the current firmware version. Compare it against the affected version ranges: 12.0.1 to 12.0.13, 12.2.1 to 12.2.11, 12.4.1 to 12.4.11, 12.6.1 to 12.6.7, 12.7.1 to 12.7.3, 13.2.1 to 13.2.4, or exactly version 13.3.1.Affected if The installed firmware version falls within any of these ranges.
-
Check if HCI Modbus TCP is enabledAccess the device configuration settings and examine the HCI Modbus TCP function status. Look for a configuration option or service status that indicates whether the Modbus TCP interface is active.Affected if The HCI Modbus TCP function is enabled and operational on the device.
-
Verify network exposure of Modbus TCP serviceReview network firewall rules or access control lists to determine if the Modbus TCP port (typically port 502) is exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet.Affected if The Modbus TCP service is reachable from untrusted networks.
A user is affected if they have an RTU520, RTU530, RTU540, or RTU560 device running a firmware version within the listed ranges with HCI Modbus TCP enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf HCI Modbus TCP functionality is not required, disable it. Otherwise, apply vendor-provided patches that implement proper rate limiting and flood protection in the HCI Modbus TCP function.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,920.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2081 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data