CVE-2023-5767
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in the webserver that affects the RTU500 series product versions listed below. A malicious actor could perform cross-site scripting on the webserver due to an RDT language file being improperly sanitized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the webserver component of ABB RTU500 series products due to improper sanitization of RDT language files. An attacker could inject malicious scripts into the language file that would then execute in the browsers of users accessing the webserver.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.14>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.9>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.6>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.6>= 13.4.1, <= 13.4.3>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.14>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.9>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.6>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.6>= 13.4.1, <= 13.4.3>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.14>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.9>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.6>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.6>= 13.4.1, <= 13.4.3>= 12.0.1, <= 12.0.14>= 12.2.1, <= 12.2.11>= 12.4.1, <= 12.4.11>= 12.6.1, <= 12.6.9>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.6>= 13.2.1, <= 13.2.6>= 13.4.1, <= 13.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the RTU500 modelLocate the device model identifier (Rtu520, Rtu530, Rtu540, or Rtu560) on the device label, in the web interface header, or via SNMP/system information queries.Affected if The model is any of Rtu520, Rtu530, Rtu540, or Rtu560.
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the webserver administrative interface and navigate to System > Firmware Information, or query the device via SNMP or the command-line interface using 'show firmware' or equivalent command.Affected if The firmware version falls within any of these ranges: 12.0.1-12.0.14, 12.2.1-12.2.11, 12.4.1-12.4.11, 12.6.1-12.6.9, 12.7.1-12.7.6, 13.2.1-13.2.6, or 13.4.1-13.4.3.
-
Verify webserver is accessibleAttempt to access the device webserver via HTTP or HTTPS on the configured port (typically 80 or 443, or a custom port). Confirm the login page or status page loads.Affected if The webserver is reachable and the device is on an affected firmware version.
-
Inspect RDT language file configurationLocate RDT language files in the webserver configuration directory (commonly found under /web/lang/ or similar paths accessible via FTP/SFTP or the web interface file manager). Examine the file structure and check for any custom or user-modified XML/JSON language definition files.Affected if Custom or modified RDT language files exist on the device and the webserver renders these files without proper sanitization.
The environment is affected if the device is an RTU520, RTU530, RTU540, or RTU560 running firmware version 12.0.1 through 12.0.14, 12.2.1 through 12.2.11, 12.4.1 through 12.4.11, 12.6.1 through 12.6.9, 12.7.1 through 12.7.6, 13.2.1 through 13.2.6, or 13.4.1 through 13.4.3, and the webserver component is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches for the RTU500 series or implement proper input validation and output encoding on the webserver to sanitize RDT language file content before rendering.
Contact Hitachi Energy for the specific fixed firmware release (versions beyond 12.6.9 for each affected branch)
- Identify the specific RTU500 series model (RTU520, RTU530, RTU540, or RTU560) in your environment
- Determine the current firmware version running on the affected device
- Contact Hitachi Energy technical support or refer to the official security advisory at publisher.hitachienergy.com to obtain the fixed firmware version
- Upgrade the firmware to the latest version provided by Hitachi Energy that addresses CVE-2023-5767
- After upgrade, verify that the webserver RDT language file is properly sanitized and no longer vulnerable to XSS
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5767 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5767 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data