CVE-2022-20812
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the API and in the web-based management interface of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow a remote attacker to overwrite arbitrary files or conduct null byte poisoning attacks on an affected device. Note: Cisco Expressway Series refers to the Expressway Control (Expressway-C) device and the Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities in the API and web-based management interface of Cisco Expressway Series (Expressway-C and Expressway-E) and TelePresence VCS allow remote attackers to overwrite arbitrary files or conduct null byte poisoning attacks on affected devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< x14.0.7< x14.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product and modelAccess the web-based management interface and locate the System Information page, or use CLI command 'xCommand SystemUnit Info' to determine if the device is Cisco Expressway Series or TelePresence VCSAffected if Device is Cisco Expressway (any variant) or TelePresence VCS
-
Determine the installed firmware versionIn the web interface, go to Status > System information and note the software version displayed, or run 'show version' via CLIAffected if Version is lower than 14.0.7 (for example, 14.0.6, 14.0.5, 13.x, etc.)
-
Verify the web-based management interface is accessibleConfirm the API and web management interface (typically ports 80/443 or 4433) are reachable from network locationsAffected if Management interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
-
Check for unauthorized file modificationsReview system logs (Maintenance > Diagnostics > Log Downloads) for any unexpected file write operations or unusual API activity related to file upload/overwrite functionsAffected if Logs show unexpected file overwrite events or suspicious API calls to file handling endpoints
The environment is affected if the device runs Cisco Expressway or TelePresence VCS with firmware version below 14.0.7 and has its web management interface accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco-provided patches or firmware updates for Expressway Series and TelePresence VCS. Restrict access to management interfaces to trusted networks only.
x14.0.7 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Cisco Expressway Series or TelePresence VCS by accessing the web management interface or using the CLI command 'xstatus version'
- 2. Navigate to the Cisco Software Download page and download version x14.0.7 or later for your specific appliance model
- 3. Back up the current configuration using the web interface (Maintenance > Backup and Restore) or CLI command 'export configuration'
- 4. Access the web management interface and go to Maintenance > Software Upgrade
- 5. Upload the downloaded software image and initiate the upgrade process
- 6. Wait for the upgrade to complete and the system to reboot
- 7. Verify the new version by checking System > Information in the web interface or running 'xstatus version' via CLI
- 8. Restore the configuration if needed using the backup created in step 3
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20812 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20812 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data