CVE-2022-20906
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient input validation during CLI command execution on an affected device. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by authenticating as the rescue-user and executing vulnerable CLI commands using a malicious payload. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root on an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerabilities in Cisco Nexus Dashboard stem from insufficient input validation in CLI command execution. An attacker with valid rescue-user credentials can inject malicious payloads through CLI commands to escape the restricted shell and obtain root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0, < 2.2\(1e\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Nexus Dashboard installationCheck for Cisco Nexus Dashboard by reviewing installed software packages, looking for 'cisco-nexus-dashboard' or 'nd' processes, or checking /opt/nd or similar installation directories if knownAffected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard software is present on the system
-
Determine installed Nexus Dashboard versionRun command: 'show version' or 'cat /etc/version' in the Nexus Dashboard CLI, or check the admin UI for the version information under System > Management > Updates or similarAffected if The installed version is 2.0 or higher but lower than 2.2(1e)
-
Verify rescue-user account configurationCheck for rescue-user account existence by attempting to list users in the CLI or by reviewing /etc/passwd or user configuration files if accessible, or check admin user settings in the Nexus Dashboard UIAffected if The rescue-user account is created or enabled on the system
-
Confirm CLI access method availabilityVerify that CLI access is enabled by checking if SSH or console access to the Nexus Dashboard is permitted, and review whether the rescue-user can log in via 'ssh rescue-user@<ip>'Affected if The rescue-user can access the CLI via SSH or console
The environment is affected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard version 2.0 through 2.2(1e) is installed and the rescue-user account exists and can access the CLI.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2
Apply Cisco's patches for CVE-2022-20906 immediately. Restrict and monitor rescue-user account access. Implement least-privilege access controls and audit CLI command execution logs.
Nexus Dashboard 2.2(1e) or later
- Verify current Nexus Dashboard version using the CLI command 'show version' or via the GUI dashboard
- Download Nexus Dashboard version 2.2(1e) or later from Cisco.com (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may cause brief service interruption
- Back up current configuration using 'backup' command or GUI backup feature
- Initiate upgrade via CLI using 'install abort' or via GUI System > Upgrade
- Monitor upgrade progress and verify completion
- After upgrade, confirm vulnerability is resolved by verifying the version and reviewing release notes
- Verify all services are operational post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,360.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20906 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data