CVE-2022-20909
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient input validation during CLI command execution on an affected device. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by authenticating as the rescue-user and executing vulnerable CLI commands using a malicious payload. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root on an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient input validation in Cisco Nexus Dashboard CLI command execution allows an authenticated attacker with rescue-user credentials to inject malicious payloads via CLI commands, achieving root privilege escalation on the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0, < 2.2\(1e\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Nexus Dashboard installationLocate and confirm Cisco Nexus Dashboard is deployed in your environment. Check for the product by reviewing system inventory, network documentation, or consulting with infrastructure teams.Affected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard is present in the environment
-
Check installed Nexus Dashboard versionAccess the Nexus Dashboard admin interface or use the CLI command 'show version' to retrieve the installed version number. Compare this version against the affected range: 2.0 up to but not including 2.2(1e).Affected if Installed version is 2.0 or higher, but lower than 2.2(1e)
-
Verify rescue-user account configurationCheck if the rescue-user account exists on the Nexus Dashboard system. This can be done by reviewing local user accounts via the CLI command 'show users' or through the administrative interface user management section.Affected if The rescue-user account is enabled or exists on the system
-
Assess CLI access exposureDetermine if CLI command execution is accessible to the rescue-user account. Review access controls, authentication settings, and network accessibility of the CLI interface.Affected if The rescue-user account can execute CLI commands on the Nexus Dashboard
Your environment is affected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard version is 2.0 or higher but below 2.2(1e), the rescue-user account exists, and that account can execute CLI commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2
Apply the Cisco vendor patch for Nexus Dashboard when available; until then, limit access to the rescue-user account and monitor CLI command execution logs for suspicious activity.
Nexus Dashboard version 2.2(1e) or later
- 1. Identify current Nexus Dashboard version by accessing the dashboard admin UI or using CLI: 'show version'
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade (this is a system-critical upgrade)
- 3. Back up current configuration and data following Cisco best practices
- 4. Download Nexus Dashboard version 2.2(1e) or later from Cisco.com (requires valid service contract)
- 5. Upload the upgrade bundle to the Nexus Dashboard
- 6. Execute the upgrade following Cisco's official upgrade procedure for Nexus Dashboard
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version: 'show version'
- 8. Confirm the fix by verifying the running version is >= 2.2(1e)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20909 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20909 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data