CVE-2022-20929
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the upgrade signature verification of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to provide an unauthentic upgrade file for upload. This vulnerability is due to insufficient cryptographic signature verification of upgrade files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing an administrator with an unauthentic upgrade file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to fully compromise the Cisco NFVIS system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in Cisco NFV Infrastructure Software's upgrade signature verification mechanism. An unauthenticated local attacker can bypass cryptographic signature checks on upgrade files, allowing them to provide a malicious firmware/image file to an administrator for upload. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full control of the NFVIS system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.5.1, < 4.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NFVIS versionRun 'show version' command in the NFVIS CLI or check the version file at /opt/infra/var/infra_version to determine the installed Cisco NFV Infrastructure Software versionAffected if Version is >= 3.5.1 and < 4.9.1
-
Verify upgrade feature is enabledCheck if the Software Management or upgrade functionality is configured and accessible. Use 'show running-config | include upgrade' or access the administration web UI to confirm upgrade capability is availableAffected if Upgrade functionality is enabled and accessible in the system
-
Inspect upgrade file staging areaExamine the default upgrade staging directory (typically /opt/infra/packages or /var/upgrade) for any unexpected or unauthorized .bin, .img, or .iso files present on the systemAffected if Unexpected image files exist in upgrade directories that were not explicitly uploaded by trusted administrators
-
Review upgrade-related logsCheck system logs in /var/log/ for entries related to upgrade operations, signature validation events, or file imports. Look for gaps or anomalies in the log sequenceAffected if Missing, altered, or suspicious entries exist in upgrade or file validation logs
-
Audit upgrade access controlsReview user accounts and role-based access controls (RBAC) to determine which users have privileges to initiate upgrades or upload firmware imagesAffected if Unrestricted or unauthorized user accounts have upgrade or image upload permissions
The environment is affected if the installed NFVIS version falls within 3.5.1 through 4.9.1 and the upgrade feature is accessible to potential attackers
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.9.1
Apply the vendor patch from Cisco when available. Until then, implement strict controls on upgrade file handling: verify file来源, use out-of-band integrity verification, and limit who can initiate upgrades.
Cisco NFVIS version 4.9.1 or later (4.x stable release)
- 1. Identify the current version of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software running on the system
- 2. Download the Cisco NFVIS software upgrade from the official Cisco download portal (software.cisco.com) or obtain it through your Cisco support contract
- 3. Verify the integrity of the downloaded upgrade file using available cryptographic checksums provided by Cisco
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- 5. Follow the standard Cisco NFVIS upgrade procedure documented in the Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software administration guide
- 6. After upgrade, verify the system is running version 4.9.1 or later and confirm all services are operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20929 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20929 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data