CVE-2022-22445
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn attacker that gains service access to the FSP (POWER9 only) or gains admin authority to a partition can compromise partition firmware.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOn POWER9 systems, an attacker with service access to the FSP (Field Support Program) or with administrator authority over a partition can compromise the partition's firmware. This represents a privilege escalation allowing firmware-level compromise of affected partitions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= fw950, < fw950.40>= fw1010, < fw1010.32CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify POWER9 system hardwareRun `lsprop -r /proc/device-tree/model` or `lscpu | grep -i power` to confirm the system uses POWER9 processor architectureAffected if The system is not POWER9 hardware (this vulnerability only affects POWER9 systems)
-
Confirm PowerVM hypervisor is in useRun `lsvpt` or check for PowerVM-specific indicators such as the presence of PowerVM-related processes or the output of `lsattr -El proc0` showing hypervisor modeAffected if The system does not run IBM PowerVM Hypervisor (other hypervisors or bare-metal are not affected)
-
Retrieve the system firmware (FSP/OPAL) versionRun `lsmcode -a` or `lsmcode` to display the current firmware level, or use the HMC interface to view the managed system firmware versionAffected if Unable to retrieve firmware version (firmware version cannot be determined)
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangesReview the firmware version output from step 3 and compare numerically: the affected ranges are fw950 through fw950.39 (inclusive), and fw1010 through fw1010.31 (inclusive)Affected if Firmware version is >= fw950 AND < fw950.40, OR >= fw1010 AND < fw1010.32 (system falls within an affected version range)
A system is affected if it is a POWER9 system running IBM PowerVM Hypervisor with firmware version fw950.0 through fw950.39 or fw1010.0 through fw1010.31.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict FSP service access to trusted personnel only and enforce strict partition administrator access controls. Apply vendor firmware updates for POWER9 when available.
PowerVM firmware fw950.40 or later, or fw1010.32 or later
- 1. Identify the current PowerVM firmware version by accessing the FSP (Flexible Service Processor) or through the HMC (Hardware Management Console)
- 2. Determine which firmware stream applies to your system (fw950 or fw1010)
- 3. Download the fixed firmware image (fw950.40 or higher, or fw1010.32 or higher) from IBM Fix Central or the IBM Support Portal
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as firmware updates may require system downtime
- 5. Apply the firmware update through the FSP or HMC using the appropriate firmware update procedure
- 6. Verify the firmware has been successfully updated to the fixed version
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking the firmware level
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22445 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22445 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data