CVE-2023-30440
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW860.00 through FW860.B3, FW950.00 through FW950.70, FW1010.00 through FW1010.50, FW1020.00 through FW1020.30, and FW1030.00 through FW1030.10 could allow a local attacker with control a partition that has been assigned SRIOV virtual function (VF) to cause a denial of service to a peer partition or arbitrary data corruption. IBM X-Force ID: 253175.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM PowerVM Hypervisor contains a vulnerability in SRIOV virtual function handling where a local attacker controlling a partition with an assigned SRIOV VF can bypass partition isolation and cause denial of service to peer partitions or induce arbitrary data corruption. This represents a hypervisor isolation failure allowing a compromised partition to impact other partitions on the same physical system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= fw860, <= fw860.b3>= fw950, <= fw950.70>= fw1010, <= fw1010.50>= fw1020.00, <= fw1020.30>= fw1030.00, <= fw1030.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PowerVM Hypervisor firmware versionUse the HMC command 'lssyscfg -r sys -F 'sys_name,firmware_version'' or via IVM 'lslic -c vl' to retrieve the current hypervisor firmware levelAffected if The installed firmware version falls within any of these ranges: fw860 through fw860.b3, fw950 through fw950.70, fw1010 through fw1010.50, fw1020.00 through fw1020.30, or fw1030.00 through fw1030.10
-
Verify SRIOV capability is configuredOn the HMC, use 'lshwres -r sriov --rsubtype virtual-func -m system_name --level sys' to list SRIOV virtual functions at system level, or via IVM check the SRIOV adapter configurationAffected if SRIOV adapters and virtual functions are configured on the system (the vulnerability only applies when SRIOV VF assignment exists)
-
Identify partitions with assigned SRIOV VFsRun 'lshwres -r sriov --rsubtype virtual-func -m system_name --level lpar' to list all partitions and their SRIOV virtual function assignmentsAffected if Any partition has one or more SRIOV virtual functions assigned, creating the attack vector described in the CVE
A system is affected if it runs a PowerVM Hypervisor firmware version within the listed ranges AND has SRIOV virtual functions assigned to any partition, as the vulnerability requires both conditions to be exploitable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the appropriate PowerVM Hypervisor firmware update from IBM that addresses this vulnerability (versions beyond the affected ranges listed). For systems where immediate patching is not feasible, consider isolating affected partitions to less trusted environments or limiting SRIOV VF assignments to trusted partitions only.
fw860.c0, fw950.80, fw1010.60, fw1020.40, or the latest fw1030 series (fw1030.20 or higher) depending on your hardware generation
- 1. Identify the current PowerVM hypervisor firmware version by running 'lsvios -np' or checking the HMC interface under System Management > Servers > [System] > System Properties > Firmware.
- 2. Based on the current firmware level, determine the minimum fixed firmware version needed: fw860.c0 or later for the 860 series, fw950.80 or later for the 950 series, fw1010.60 or later for the 1010 series, fw1020.40 or later for the 1020 series.
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware update from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/) by searching for PowerVM and your specific system firmware level.
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as firmware updates require system downtime.
- 5. If using HMC, use the HMC GUI (Systems > Hardware Management > [System] > Tasks > Serviceability > Firmware Update) or command line 'updfw' to apply the new firmware.
- 6. For SEA (Shared Ethernet Adapter) or SRIOV configurations, ensure proper migration planning as these virtual functions may be affected during the update.
- 7. After firmware update, verify the new firmware level matches the target fixed version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30440 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30440 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data