CVE-2022-22625
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.6.5, macOS Monterey 12.3, Security Update 2022-003 Catalina. Processing a maliciously crafted AppleScript binary may result in unexpected application termination or disclosure of process memory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in macOS AppleScript binary processing. When processing a maliciously crafted AppleScript binary, the vulnerability allows an attacker to read memory beyond allocated buffers, potentially causing application termination (denial of service) or leaking process memory contents. The fix involves improved input validation in AppleScript handling.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.15, < 10.15.7= 10.15.7< 11.6.5>= 12.0.0, < 12.3= 10.15.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check macOS versionRun 'sw_vers -productVersion' in Terminal to get the exact version numberAffected if Version is 10.15.x, 11.x before 11.6.5, or 12.x before 12.3 (including 12.0.0-12.2)
-
Identify macOS release nameRun 'sw_vers -productVersion' and map to release: 10.15.x = Catalina, 11.x = Big Sur, 12.x = MontereyAffected if Running Catalina (10.15), Big Sur 11.0-11.6.4, or Monterey 12.0-12.2
-
Verify AppleScript support is presentCheck for /System/Library/Frameworks/AppleScript.framework existence or run 'osascript -v' to confirm AppleScript interpreter is availableAffected if AppleScript framework is installed and accessible on the system
-
Check for automation/AppleScript execution accessReview which applications have Automation permission in System Preferences > Security & Privacy > Privacy > Automation, or run 'osascript -e "say \"test\""' to confirm execution worksAffected if Any application has AppleScript/Automation permissions enabled, allowing processing of AppleScript binaries
-
Determine if system processes untrusted AppleScript binariesAudit scheduled tasks, launched agents/daemons, or user workflows that execute .scpt or compiled AppleScript files from untrusted sourcesAffected if The system runs or processes AppleScript binaries from sources outside the trusted administrative circle
The system is affected if it runs any macOS version in the range 10.15.x, 11.0-11.6.4, or 12.0-12.2 AND has AppleScript capabilities enabled to process potentially untrusted AppleScript binaries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.15.711.6.512.3
Apply the applicable Apple security update: macOS Big Sur 11.6.5, macOS Monterey 12.3, or Security Update 2022-003 for Catalina. Prioritize systems that process untrusted AppleScript binaries.
macOS 11.6.5 (Big Sur), macOS 12.3 (Monterey), or Security Update 2022-003 for Catalina
- Back up your Mac using Time Machine before applying any system updates
- Identify your current macOS version by clicking Apple menu > About This Mac
- For macOS 10.15 (Catalina): Install Security Update 2022-003 via System Preferences > Software Update, or upgrade to a supported macOS version (Big Sur 11.7+ or Monterey 12.4+)
- For macOS 11.x (Big Sur versions before 11.6.5): Install macOS 11.6.5 via System Preferences > Software Update
- For macOS 12.x (Monterey versions 12.0-12.2): Install macOS 12.3 via System Preferences > Software Update
- After updating, verify the update was successful by checking About This Mac shows the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22625 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data