FortiadcApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2022-23439

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.5.2 / 6.0.11 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A externally controlled reference to a resource in another sphere vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to poison web caches via crafted HTTP requests, where the `Host` header points to an arbitrary webserver

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Fortinet products contain an externally controlled reference vulnerability where crafted HTTP requests with a manipulated Host header pointing to an arbitrary webserver can poison web caches. This allows attackers to potentially inject malicious content into cached responses served to other users.

MitigationImplement strict validation of Host headers in web applications and consider implementing cache keying that includes additional parameters to prevent cache poisoning. Apply any available Fortinet patches for affected products.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortiadcApplication
Affected:>= 5.4.0, < 6.2.4
FortiauthenticatorApplication
Affected:>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.4>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.2
FortiddosApplication
Affected:>= 5.3.0, < 5.5.2
Fortiddos FApplication
Affected:>= 6.1.0, < 6.3.4
FortimailApplication
Affected:>= 6.4.0, < 7.0.4
FortindrApplication
Affected:>= 1.4.0, < 7.1.1= 7.2.0
FortiproxyApplication
Affected:>= 2.0.0, < 7.0.5>= 7.2.0, < 7.4.0
FortirecorderApplication
Affected:>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.11>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Fortinet product
    Access the device CLI or web interface and run the command 'get system status' or check the dashboard to identify the product name (e.g., Fortiadc, Fortiauthenticator, Fortiddos, Fortimail, Fortiproxy, Fortirecorder)
    Affected if The product is any of these Fortinet products: Fortiadc, Fortiauthenticator, Fortiddos, Fortiddos F, Fortimail, Fortindr, Fortiproxy, or Fortirecorder
  2. Determine the installed firmware version
    Run 'get system status' in CLI or check System > Firmware in the web interface to find the exact version number
    Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: Fortiadc < 6.2.4 (>= 5.4.0), Fortiauthenticator < 6.3.4 (>= 6.3.0) or < 6.4.2 (>= 6.4.0), Fortiddos < 5.5.2 (>= 5.3.0), Fortiddos F < 6.3.4 (>= 6.1.0), Fortimail < 7.0.4 (>= 6.4.0), Fortindr < 7.1.1 (>= 1.4.0) or = 7.2.0, Fortiproxy < 7.0.5 (>= 2.0.0) or
  3. Check if web caching or proxy service is enabled
    For Fortiproxy: go to Security Profiles > Web Cache or run 'show webcache' in CLI. For Fortiadc: check Load Balance > Web Cache settings. For Fortimail: check Mail Settings > Web Cache. For other products, inspect the proxy or caching configuration.
    Affected if Web caching or HTTP proxy functionality is enabled and serving cached content to users
  4. Verify Host header handling in the configuration
    Inspect the proxy or web service configuration for Host header validation settings. Run 'show' commands related to proxy, webcache, or HTTP forwarding. Check whether Host header values are used as cache keys without validation.
    Affected if The device uses the Host header as part of the cache key without strict validation, or forwards requests with arbitrary Host headers to backend servers

A user is affected if they are running any of the listed Fortinet products within the specified version ranges AND have web caching or HTTP proxy features enabled that use Host headers in cache keying.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.5.2 / 6.0.11 / 6.2.4 or later
Fixed in 5.5.26.0.116.2.4
Interim mitigation

Implement strict validation of Host headers in web applications and consider implementing cache keying that includes additional parameters to prevent cache poisoning. Apply any available Fortinet patches for affected products.

Recommended fix High confidence

Fortiadc: 6.2.4+ | Fortiauthenticator: 6.3.4+ or 6.4.2+ | Fortiddos: 5.5.2+ | Fortiddos F: 6.3.4+ | Fortimail: 7.0.4+ | Fortindr: 7.1.1+ (avoid 7.2.0) | Fortiproxy: 7.0.5+ or 7.4.0+ | Fortirecorder: 6.0.11+ or 6.4.3+

  1. 1. Identify the affected Fortinet product from your deployment (Fortiadc, Fortiauthenticator, Fortiddos, Fortiddos F, Fortimail, Fortindr, Fortiproxy, or Fortirecorder)
  2. 2. Determine the currently installed version using the product's CLI (typically `get system status` or ` diagnose system full-status`) or web UI
  3. 3. Consult Fortinet's FortiGuard advisories or release notes for the specific fixed release corresponding to your product line
  4. 4. Download the fixed firmware version from Fortinet's support portal (support.fortinet.com) after authenticating with valid entitlements
  5. 5. Back up the current configuration following the product's backup procedures
  6. 6. Upload and install the fixed firmware via the web UI (System > Firmware or similar) or CLI (`execute firmware upgrade`)
  7. 7. After upgrade, verify the version matches the fixed release and confirm normal operation
Caveat Standard Fortinet firmware upgrade - review release notes for any configuration migration notes; minor version jumps within same major release typically have minimal breaking changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fortiadc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23439 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23439 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data