CVE-2023-26205
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiADC automation feature 7.1.0 through 7.1.2, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions may allow an authenticated low-privileged attacker to escalate their privileges to super_admin via a specific crafted configuration of fabric automation CLI script.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFortiADC's fabric automation feature contains an improper access control vulnerability allowing authenticated low-privilege users to escalate to super_admin through crafted CLI script configurations. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user privileges when processing automation scripts in versions 7.1.0-7.1.2, 7.0, 6.2, and 6.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.1.0, <= 6.1.6>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.6>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.5= 7.1.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiADC versionRun 'get system status' via CLI or check the web UI dashboard for the firmware version numberAffected if The version falls within 6.1.0-6.1.6, 6.2.0-6.2.6, 7.0.0-7.0.5, 7.1.0-7.1.2 (specifically 7.1.0, 7.1.1, or 7.1.2)
-
Verify Fabric Automation feature is enabledRun 'get system fabric' or check the automation configuration via 'show system automation' in the CLIAffected if The automation or fabric automation feature is enabled on the device
-
Review user account roles and privilegesRun 'get system user' or 'show system user' to list all local users and their assigned profilesAffected if There are users assigned to profiles other than 'super_admin' (such as 'admin' or custom profiles with limited privileges)
-
Inspect automation stitch/trigger configurationsRun 'show system automation stitch' and 'show system automation trigger' to list all automation configurationsAffected if Any automation stitches or triggers exist, especially those configured by non-super_admin users
A user is affected if the FortiADC version is within the listed ranges AND the Fabric Automation feature is enabled AND there are non-super_admin users with access to automation configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches for FortiADC that address this privilege escalation in the automation feature, and review user role configurations to ensure low-privileged accounts cannot modify automation settings.
FortiADC 7.1.2 or later (for 7.x users); FortiADC 7.0.6 or later (for 7.0.x users); FortiADC 6.2.7 or later (for 6.2.x users); FortiADC 6.1.7 or later (for 6.1.x users)
- 1. Identify the currently deployed FortiADC version using the web UI (System > Dashboard > Status) or CLI: `get system status`
- 2. Based on the affected version range, plan upgrade to FortiADC 7.1.2 or later (7.1.2 is the first fixed release mentioned in the official description)
- 3. Backup the current FortiADC configuration via CLI: `execute backup config tftp <config_name> <tftp_server_ip>` or via web UI (System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore)
- 4. Download the firmware upgrade file from Fortinet support portal (support.fortinet.com)
- 5. Upload the firmware via web UI (System > Firmware > Upload) or CLI: `execute upload firmware tftp <filename> <tftp_server_ip>`
- 6. After upload completes, reboot the device to apply the new firmware: `execute reboot`
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful and the new version is running: `get system status`
- 8. Review user accounts and automation scripts to ensure no unauthorized privilege escalation occurred
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26205 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26205 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data