CVE-2022-2625
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in PostgreSQL. This attack requires permission to create non-temporary objects in at least one schema, the ability to lure or wait for an administrator to create or update an affected extension in that schema, and the ability to lure or wait for a victim to use the object targeted in CREATE OR REPLACE or CREATE IF NOT EXISTS. Given all three prerequisites, this flaw allows an attacker to run arbitrary code as the victim role, which may be a superuser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a PostgreSQL privilege escalation vulnerability where an attacker with schema object creation permissions can manipulate objects that get replaced during extension updates. By creating a malicious object and waiting for an admin to update an extension or for a victim to use CREATE OR REPLACE/CREATE IF NOT EXISTS, the attacker can execute arbitrary code with the victim role's privileges, potentially including superuser.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0, < 10.22>= 11.0, < 11.17>= 12.0, < 12.12>= 13.0, < 13.8>= 14.0, < 14.5= 15= 36= 6.0= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed PostgreSQL versionRun 'psql -c "SELECT version();"' or check the package manager (rpm -qa | grep postgres, dpkg -l | grep postgres)Affected if The version falls within one of these ranges: 10.0-10.21, 11.0-11.16, 12.0-12.11, 13.0-13.7, 14.0-14.4, or 15.0
-
Identify users with schema creation privilegesQuery pg_roles: 'SELECT rolname, rolcreate FROM pg_roles WHERE rolcreate = true;' or check for users with CREATE permission on public schemaAffected if Any non-superuser role has schema creation permissions and could potentially exploit this flaw
-
Identify extensions using CREATE OR REPLACEQuery pg_extension: 'SELECT extname, extversion, extrelocatable FROM pg_extension;' Review any extension update scripts in your environmentAffected if Extensions that support CREATE OR REPLACE are present and could be manipulated during updates
-
Check for untrusted extensions in useReview extensions loaded in databases: 'SELECT * FROM pg_extension;' and verify their sourcesAffected if Extensions from untrusted sources or custom extensions are installed that could be replaced
-
Identify superuser roles in the databaseQuery: 'SELECT rolname FROM pg_roles WHERE rolsuper = true;'Affected if Superuser accounts exist and could be targeted if an attacker gains schema creation rights
You are affected if your PostgreSQL version is in the vulnerable range AND untrusted users have schema creation permissions that could be leveraged to manipulate extension objects during updates.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.2211.1712.12
Restrict schema creation permissions to trusted users only, carefully control who can create or update extensions, avoid granting unnecessary privileges, and minimize the number of superuser accounts.
PostgreSQL 10.22, 11.17, 12.12, or 13.8 (depending on your major version)
- 1. Back up all PostgreSQL databases using pg_dumpall or your preferred backup method
- 2. Stop the PostgreSQL service (e.g., systemctl stop postgresql or pg_ctl stop)
- 3. Update PostgreSQL packages using your system's package manager (e.g., dnf update postgresql, apt update postgresql, or yum update postgresql)
- 4. If using a Fedora or Enterprise Linux system, ensure you update to the corrected package versions that include the fix
- 5. Start the PostgreSQL service (e.g., systemctl start postgresql or pg_ctl start)
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the PostgreSQL version (SELECT version();)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,592.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2625 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data