V SftApplication · Fujielectric

CVE-2022-26302

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.1.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Heap-based buffer overflow exists in the simulator module contained in the graphic editor 'V-SFT' versions prior to v6.1.6.0, which may allow an attacker to obtain information and/or execute arbitrary code by having a user to open a specially crafted image file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the simulator module of V-SFT graphic editor versions prior to v6.1.6.0. The vulnerability is triggered when a user opens a specially crafted malicious image file, potentially allowing an attacker to read sensitive information from heap memory or achieve arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade V-SFT to version 6.1.6.0 or later. Until the upgrade is applied, refrain from opening image files from untrusted sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
V SftApplication
Affected:>= 6.0.0.0, < 6.1.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if V-SFT is installed
    Look for the Fujielectric V-SFT application in the system Program Files directory, or check for V-SFT entries in the Windows Registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Fujielectric or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Fujielectric
    Affected if V-SFT is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed V-SFT version
    Open V-SFT and navigate to Help > About, or locate the main executable (typically named VSFT.exe or similar) and view its file properties to find the version number
    Affected if The displayed version falls within the range >= 6.0.0.0 and < 6.1.6.0
  3. Verify the simulator module is present
    Check for the simulator module component within the V-SFT installation directory, typically found in a subfolder named 'Simulator' or 'Sim' containing simulator-related DLL or executable files
    Affected if The simulator module files exist in the V-SFT installation folder
  4. Confirm the simulator is accessible to users
    Check user permissions on the simulator module files and verify that standard users can launch and interact with the simulator functionality through the V-SFT interface
    Affected if Users have access to open and use the simulator module with image files

The environment is affected if V-SFT version 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.5.x is installed and the simulator module is accessible to users who could open untrusted image files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.1.6.0 or later
Fixed in 6.1.6.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade V-SFT to version 6.1.6.0 or later. Until the upgrade is applied, refrain from opening image files from untrusted sources.

Recommended fix High confidence

v6.1.6.0

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed version of V-SFT graphic editor
  2. 2. Confirm the installed version is within the affected range: >= 6.0.0.0 and < 6.1.6.0
  3. 3. Obtain the fixed version v6.1.6.0 or later from the official vendor (Fuji Electric monitouch)
  4. 4. Apply the upgrade following vendor-provided installation instructions
  5. 5. Verify the installed version is now v6.1.6.0 or higher

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in V Sft Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-26302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-26302 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data